Nate Cohn at The Upshot with evidence supporting the dynamic I’d mentioned a few days ago: incremental restrictions on voting may be disproportionately impacting Trump supporters.
“Partisan gridlock prevents fixes to Pennsylvania’s voting laws as presidential election looms”
I can co-sign the AP’s lede:
Pennsylvania is seeing lots of action targeting gaps in its vote-by-mail laws. The problem is that it’s in the courtroom and not the legislature.
And no, I’m not suggesting that’s a problem of constitutional magnitude.
“Documents detail Republican push to force hand counts in Arizona election”
A Guardian report about the press for hand counts, the product of election denialism that led to criminal charges when supervisors refused to certify results.
I’m old enough to remember when it was the hand counting that was causing the dispute.
Carter Center pilot observation project in Missoula, Montana, primary
The Carter Center has a long history of profoundly deep expertise fielding strictly nonpartisan election observation missions across the globe. They were on the ground in the US to observe Georgia’s 2022 risk-limiting audit.
And now they’re out with preliminary findings from what they’ve described as a pilot for future observation programs: a partnership with the Montana Election Observation Initiative to monitor the Missoula primary. This sort of professionalized mission, with fulsome reporting premised on real understanding of election administration and the diversity of laws and procedures, could be a welcome model.
“Despite gains, Native Americans still face voting barriers”
An update from Voice of America that still points to an awfully long way to go.
“Illinois Republicans grapple with mail voting amid mixed signals from Trump — ‘We have to adapt'”
WBEZ has the story about trying to motivate voters in the face of very mixed messaging.
Related, I recently learned about the origin story for the VRA’s 1970 guarantee of uniform protections for absentee balloting in presidential races: none other than liberal icon Barry Goldwater. His testimony on his proposal starts at p. 277 of the Senate Judiciary hearings available here (though be warned – the file’s a hefty download). (h/t Mike Rosin)