Release: The Justice Department announced today that it has secured an agreement with the City of Pawtucket, Rhode Island, and city elections officials to resolve allegations that Pawtucket failed to provide Spanish-language assistance for voters in violation of the Voting… Continue reading

New Common Ground Democracy essay on the Supreme Court’s decision yesterday involving South Carolina’s congressional districts. There’s a way to avoid all the difficulties, and disagreements, over the relationship of race to redistricting: it’s to give the decision of what… Continue reading

AP: The North Carolina Supreme Court on Thursday threw out a defamation lawsuit against attorneys who assisted voters with submitting some 2016 ballot complaints, saying the fraud allegations they helped make were broadly protected within the protest process. The 5-0… Continue reading

The following is a guest post from Travis Crum: The wait for Alexander v. South Carolina Conference of the NAACP is finally over. Nearly five months after the parties asked for the case to be resolved, the Court has… Continue reading

Putting to the side the merits of the Court’s decision itself, I think the stakes going forward are lower than might be realized. After the 2010 round of redistricting, racial gerrymandering cases became important during a transitional phase of redistricting… Continue reading

What’s happening here? NEW: Ousted Milwaukee election chief Claire Woodall, in an agreement to temporarily extend her time with the election commission, can't talk to any elex staff except new chief Paulina Gutierrez; is limited (along w/ city staff) in… Continue reading

Many (most?) racial gerrymandering cases have partisan as well as race-related objectives. Why did the plaintiffs sue in Alexander, the South Carolina case decided by the Court today? At least in part to try to get a second Democratic congressional… Continue reading