AP reports. BAN links to the opinion. I also thought this footnote addressing the state’s allegation that non-residents were more likely to commit election fraud has broader significance:
The rejected claim was that part of Prop. 13 “changed the fundamental structure and foundational powers of the legislative and executive branches of government” and therefore was really a revision of the CA constitution and not a permissible amendment. The… Continue reading
LA Times: “A Sacramento Superior Court judge Monday dismissed a challenge from initiative proponent Molly Munger, who had sought to ensure her tax measure appeared before one backed by Gov. Jerry Brown on the November ballot. Judge Michael Kenny… Continue reading
News of a very intriguing change in California’s election law, “to elevate any initiative with a constitutional impact to a more prominent spot on the ballot, right beneath bond measures.” I smell a call for empirical experimentation…
Cincinnati Enquirer: “The gambit, apparently the first time that Ohio legislators have ever effectively killed a referendum destined for voters, sets up a possible lawsuit over a question that could impact this fall’s election: May state legislators repeal a… Continue reading
The federal district court opinion in Chula Vista Citizens for Jobs and Fair Competition v. Norris begins:
This case presents two questions of first impression. It asks whether the First Amendment grants a corporation or association the right to serve… Continue reading