You can read Judge Griffin’s brief at this link. It briefly cites Bush v. Gore, but completely ignores the main point about irreparable harm that Justice Scalia first flagged in his Bush v. Gore stay concurrence. See here.
The state election board’s brief, also filed today, makes the point succinctly:
Fourth, an injunction is in the public interest. Implementing a state election process “of questionable legality . . . cast[s] a cloud upon” “the legitimacy of [the] election.” Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 1046, 1047 (2000) (Scalia, J., concurring). “Count first, and rule upon legality afterwards, is not a recipe for producing election results that have the public acceptance democratic stability requires.” Id.