In response to a question at a city council meeting, an advocacy organization’s representative apparently noted that one county’s implementation of RCV might cost an extra $36,000 for software licensing, ballot design, and the like … and that the organization would be willing to cover the gap. It’s not exactly an inducement to participate, but likely still violates Utah’s new law against accepting private donations. (And the advocate, saying she wasn’t aware of the law, has since backed off of the suggestion.)
I think it’s likely that the laws restricting private funding are going to end up with more complicated impacts than the legislators have foreseen, and not in ways that help local officials administer elections.