Josh Douglas has posted this draft on SSRN (Rutgers Law Review, and part of this symposium on the 26th Amendment). Here is the abstract:
This short essay, prepared for the Rutgers University Law Review Symposium on the Twenty-Sixth Amendment, shows how state constitutions protect young voters. Just as state courts should construe the general right-to-vote provisions within state constitutions as conferring broader rights than what is available through federal court jurisprudence under the Fourteenth Amendment, so too should state courts recognize explicitly that state constitutions go beyond the federal counterpart on youth voting rights. The Essay recounts the recent litigation over the Twenty-Sixth Amendment, demonstrating how federal courts have too narrowly construed that amendment. The Essay then highlights what state constitutions say about youth voting rights and offers a strategy for litigants to invoke these provisions when challenging laws that harm young people. Finally, the Essay presents a broader call to action for advocates to focus on state constitutional amendments that can strengthen these provisions—or face their potential weakening from those who want to restrict the right to vote.