Monthly Archives: January 2015

Disqualification Clause Debate

Extensive debate in Quinnipiac Law Review:

Benjamin Cassady, “You’ve Got Your Crook, I’ve Got Mine”: Why the Disqualification Clause Doesn’t (Always) Disqualify, 32 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 209 (2014), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2447970 
 
Mike Stern, Foreward, An Exchange on the Disqualification Clause, 33 Quinnipiac L. Rev. i (2014) (by invitation), available at http://tinyurl.com/ktftzqt 
 
Peter C. Hoffer, The Pleasures and Perils of Presentism: A Meditation on History and Law, 33 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 1 (2014) (invited response to Cassady), available at http://tinyurl.com/ktftzqt 
 
Brian C. Kalt, The Application of the Disqualification Clause to Congress: A Response to Benjamin Cassady, “You’ve Got Your Crook, I’ve Got Mine”: Why the Disqualification Clause Doesn’t (Always) Disqualify, 33 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 7 (2014) (invited response), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2490963 
 
Buckner F. Melton, Jr., Let Me Be Blunt: In Blount, the Senate Never Said that Senators Aren’t Impeachable, 33 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 33 (2014) (invited response), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2509665
 
Seth Barrett Tillman, Originalism & The Scope of the Constitution’s Disqualification Clause, 33 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 59-111 (2014) (invited response), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2484377 
Share this:

“New Study Highlights Need for Expanded Voter Information in Judicial Races”

Court News Ohio:

The biggest reason Ohioans say they don’t vote for judges is because they don’t know enough about the candidates. These and other results from a survey of 1,000 registered Ohio voters were discussed today at the annual Associated Press Legislative Preview by Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor.

The survey, which was conducted in October last year by the Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics at the University of Akron, focused on the drop off in votes cast in judicial races.

Share this: