The Court won’t be issuing an opinion today on Louisiana’s congressional map after all. Instead, they’ll re-hear argument next term.
More analysis coming momentarily.
But given the time they spent on the birthright citizenship case, it’s not going to be out by the time the digest version of the blog hits your inbox. I’ll have it here as soon as it’s available.
Jamie Piltch and Aaron Goldzimer have a new piece in the Wash. U. L. Rev. Online:
Rucho v. Common Cause and the failure to pass H.R. 1 have left national gerrymandering reform on life support. At present, however, states committed… Continue reading
In the Alabama redistricting case, readers will recall the May 8 unanimous 571-page-opinion from one judge first appointed by Reagan and two judges appointed by Trump; the opinion said, inter alia, “try as we might, we cannot understand the… Continue reading
The Court did not decide Louisiana v. Callais today.
The case involves a challenge to Louisiana’s congressional maps. In 2023, after a federal court found Louisiana had violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by failing to provide a… Continue reading
Bloomberg
“The New Jersey Supreme Court rejected a challenge to municipal political district drawing, short-circuiting litigation that could have led to a wave of redistricting lawsuits across the state.
The divided court ruled that judges need not consider mathematical formulas… Continue reading
PBS News
Plaintiffs allege “GOP legislative leaders violated federal law and the U.S. Constitution when they enacted new electoral maps.” Republicans claim the maps are a legal partisan gerrymander.
“Favorable rulings for the plaintiffs could force Republicans to redraw maps… Continue reading
NYT:
President Trump’s political team is encouraging Republican leaders in Texas to examine how House district lines in the state could be redrawn ahead of next year’s midterm elections to try to save the party’s endangered majority, according to people… Continue reading
I’ll post some academic pieces over the weekend. First up, Leonard C. Brahin in the Barry Law Review:
Evidentiary and substantive presumptions are a well-established tool that courts employ when addressing a variety of legal problems. These presumptions streamline… Continue reading
The decision in Christian Ministerial Alliance v. Thurston, written by Judge Stras on the Eighth Circuit and joined by two district court judges, is here.
A coming vote on new mid-decade maps for Tarrant County, Texas (where Ft. Worth is the county seat) has been quite controversial, with charges of racial and partisan impropriety, and likely litigation on the horizon.
County Judge Tim O’Hare has… Continue reading