Here is the jurisdictional statement in Harris v. McCrory.
I believe this is the first case raising issues of partisan gerrymandering to make it to the Supreme Court since Justice Scalia’s passing. Will they touch it? I don’t know. One… Continue reading
Here’s the inflammatory statement:
“Since today’s decision by three partisan Democrats ignores legal precedent, ignores the fact that other federal courts have used North Carolina’s law as a model, and ignores the fact that a majority of other states have… Continue reading
Jason Steed:
My theory: If we get deep into August and the polls are showing not only a strong lead for Clinton but also promising leads in enough of those senate races, it will take only credible whispers of… Continue reading
Jonathan Adler has edited this volume for OUP which has a great lineup of writers. Among them is one of my favorites (though we often disagree), Joel Gora, who wrote a chapter on the Roberts Court and Citizens United. Here… Continue reading
Back in 2012, I first noted this resource under development. This database at the Federal Judicial Center has now grown to over 340 cases, and is a treasure trove of data. For some of the cases, it gives some information… Continue reading
Jess Bravin for the WSJ:
A single Democratic appointment to the Supreme Court could doom the 2010 Citizens United decision, which struck down restrictions on corporate and union political spending. That ruling and other opinions invalidating campaign finance laws came… Continue reading
Pam Fessler reports for NPR.
She says Texas has not yet decided whether or not to appeal to the Supreme Court. I explained yesterday why such an appeal would have long odds.