Chief Justice Roberts, speaking in West Virginia, offered some critique of the Court’s own style during oral argument. Apparently, “Roberts suggested lawyers not even try to respond when the justices posed rapid-fire questions.”
Students: this does not mean you can… Continue reading
The Washington Post has this handy infographic on The Nine. Moving the cursor lets you see the percentage of opinions in which each Justice agreed with his or her colleagues. Purely personally, I find it more instructive to “view all… Continue reading
Ross Douthat’s latest column follows the “backlash” narrative: if the aftermath of Shelby County sees more laws marginally increasing burdens for some, that will inspire greater compensatory turnout from others.
Two short notes on this argument. First, voters aren’t fungible. … Continue reading
Some of you may have noticed that it’s been something of a busy week in the world of election law (and beyond).
What with trying to keep up with the flood of news and reaction and commentary and speculation here… Continue reading
Readers may remember that, almost exactly two years ago, Texas decided to seek preclearance for its redistricting plans — including the state Senate plan — in a DC federal court, rather than submitting the plans to the Department of Justice. … Continue reading
Unsurprisingly, a take somewhat different from that of the NY Times. Surprisingly, in pointing out that things are not “just fine” in Boston and Cook County, it seems to be calling for enhanced federal (or at least statewide) action.
This Mother Jones story discusses this new paper by Chris Elmendorf and Doug Spencer, trying to tease out distinctions among jurisdictions potentially relevant to a new VRA coverage formula.
Yet again, worth a read. The title of his Balkinization piece:
Q. What’s worse than discrimination? (A) Accusations of bigotry. (B) Stopping discrimination.
More here.