“Election Law and the Roberts Court” Symposium Papers

The Ohio State Law Journal has now posted this page with links to the papers being published in its two-issue symposium. They include the following:

-Edward Foley, The Ohio State University, Election Law and the Roberts Court: An Introduction
-Richard Briffault, Columbia University, WRTL and Randall: The Roberts Court and the Unsettling of Campaign Finance Law
-Rick Hasen, Loyola Law School of Los Angeles, The Newer Incoherence: Competition, Social Science, and Balancing in Campaign Finance Law After Randall v. Sorrell
-Pam Karlan, Stanford University, New Beginnings and Dead Ends in the Law of Democracy
-Michael Solimine, University of Cincinnati, Institutional Process, Agenda Setting, and the Development of Election Law on the Supreme Court
-Brad Smith, Capital University, The John Roberts Salvage Company: After McConnell, a New Court Looks to Repair the Constitution
-Ellen Katz, University of Michigan, Reviving the Right to Vote
-Dan Lowenstein, University of California at Los Angeles, The Meaning of Bush v. Gore
-Richard Pildes, New York University, The Decline of Legally Mandated Minority Representation
-Daniel Tokaji, The Ohio State University, Leave It to the Lower Courts: On Judicial Intervention in Election Administration
-Edward Foley, The Ohio State University, The Future of Bush v. Gore
-John Fortier, American Enterprise Institute, Foley on the Future of Bush v. Gore
-Michael Kang, Emory University, When Courts Won’t Make Law: Judicial Paralysis and Partisan Gerrymandering
-Samuel Issacharoff & Jonathan Nagler, New York University, Protected from Politics: Diminishing Margins of Electoral Competition in U.S. Congressional Elections
-Guy-Uriel Charles, University of Minnesota, Race, Redistricting, and Representation

Share this: