Ned Foley has written this Moritz commentary, which begins: “Each state in the nation needs to develop a regular institutional process by which it easily updates, in light of the experience of other states, its own laws that will govern in the event that a close election in that state ends up in a legal dispute. The need for this routine rule-revising regime is an idea developed in a paper entitled The Analysis and Mitigation of Electoral Errors: Theory, Practice, and Policy, which I presented last month at the Conference on Elections and Democracy at Stanford Law School. The paper will be published by the Stanford Law & Policy Review, one of the conference’s co-sponsors.” Ned’s paper is on my “to read” list.