Catching up department: Metts v. Murphy en banc oral argument

On February 4, the First Circuit held an en banc oral argument in a very important case under section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The Providence Journal article on the argument is here. A reader also sent along the following comments:

    [T]he argument was not too enlightening for someone who read the panel opinion and briefs. Judges Lynch and Selya were active questioners, promoting the disparate views they expressed in the panel opinions. The other judges were much less involved. So it

    Share this: