Lani Guinier and Gerald Torres have written this Boston Globe oped, which begins: “DURING ORAL arguments on the Texas redistricting case March 1, Chief Justice John Roberts asked the lawyer for the Mexican-American appellants: ”What’s the difference between “‘being one” and ‘”ooking like one?”‘” Another snippet: “Frankly, though, it is the game of redistricting that is mistaken. At the heart of Roberts’s question is a profound tension between the rights of politicians and the rights of voters. Should voters trust politicians to decide who best represents the interests of Latino voters in this case, or all voters more generally? Should it be entirely up to the state to decide the difference between ”being one’ and ”looking like one’? No. The voters, not the politicians, should decide. Districts should reflect linked fates, not linked faces.”