“New 527 Bill Plugs Some Major Holes, but is it Constitutional?”

Donald Tobin offers this commentary. This commentary is notable because Tobin (and Ned Foley) had initially defended some regulation of independent expenditure committees as consistent with the First Amendment in a BNA article. But now Tobin writes of the new 527 bill: “Although the new McCain-Feingold legislation attempts to close some loopholes exploited by some advocacy group, there is a serious question whether the legislation as written is constitutional. Advocates need to provide strong evidence that contributions to 527 political organizations that engage in only a minimal level of federal advocacy pose significant corruption concerns to warrant the infringement on their First Amendment rights.”

Share this: