Evidence? We Don’t Need No Stinking Evidence.

Chief Justice Roberts in today’s opinion (which I am now editing for our casebook supplement): “As in Davis, we do not need empirical evidence to determine that the law at issue is burdensome. See 554 U.S., at 738–740 (requiring no evidence of a burden whatsoever).”

I’ve written about the Court’s wildly inconsistent approach to evidence in the campaign finance cases before, most recently in my Michigan Law Review article on Citizens United.

 

Share this: