“About that Precedent”

The New York Times editorializes about the Va. contributions case. The editorial begins:

    It’s a rare day that a federal judge decides to revisit a decision the week after making it or that the Justice Department apologizes for failing to brief him on the crucial precedent. A re-do is clearly called for.

The editorial also says some nice things about this blog.

My earlier coverage and analysis of this case is here, here, and here.


Comments are closed.