A vote on censure will happen later today. I find it difficult to understand why Rangel, at this point, cares about whether he has a public censure or written reprimand. Peter Overby interviews former House members who talk about how the public censure makes them uncomfortable. But it seems to me that Rangel’s legacy is tarnished, and whether or not he has an additional uncomfortable afternoon or not is not going to make a great deal of difference. What am I missing?