The National Law Review has just published a story about the Third Circuit’s decision last month to invalidate on Anderson-Burdick grounds Pennsylvania’s law requiring the rejection of timely submitted mailed ballots that are misdated by the voters. Will a cert petition be filed in the case? If so, will it be granted? Although in January SCOTUS declined to consider a case that challenged the same rule under the statutory materiality provision, that case sustained the validity of the rule against the statutory challenge. Given instead that in this case the rule was invalidated and specifically on Anderson-Burdick grounds–and given especially that there has been some interest among judges in revisiting the Anderson-Burdick balancing test–what’s the possibility that SCOTUS would take this case for the specific purpose of that revisiting?