“Constitutional and Normative Issues Related to the Regulation of Internet-Based Campaign Activities Under the California Political Reform Act”

Tomorrow I am testifying at a hearing of Fair Political Practices Commission Subcommittee on the Political Reform Act & Internet Political Activity. I have posted my prepared testimony here. From the Introduction:

    In my brief presentation today, which is accompanied by a set of Powerpoint slides, I hope to make three main points.
    First, I present what I term the “Goldilocks approach:” The appropriate model for regulation of Internet-based campaign communications should focus on the role of money in the communications and unique features of Internet-based communications, following the approach of the PRA generally.
    Second, I argue that the FPPC and Legislature should carefully examine existing campaign finance regulations and laws, and they should consider appropriate and sensible revisions related to Internet-based campaign communications that further goals of the PRA.
    Third, and finally, I suggest that campaign finance regulators create a safe harbor from public disclosure (especially over the Internet) for low-dollar campaign-related activities. An exemption from public disclosure (as opposed to reporting to FPPC) may be constitutionally necessary to avoid threats of harassment, and likely represents good public policy.

Share

Comments are closed.