See this ruling and this news story. A knowledgeable reader tells me that this case involves a similar, although not identical, geographic area to the City of Irving case that has been the subject of several entries on the blog. It had the same plaintiff, same attorneys, and same expert witnesses as the city case but a different judge and a different result. Pages 20-26 discuss how this court reached a different conclusion than the court in the City of Irving case.
What would I do without my great readers?