At the BLT, Tony Mauro follows up on my post yesterday about Floyd Abrams seeking divided argument on behalf of Sen. McConnell in Citizens United.
UPDATE: SCOTUSblog, in this post, links to McConnell’s motion and Citizen United’s opposition. Here’s a nice little tidbit from the opposition: “Though it is true Citizens United did not participate in the oral argument before this Court in McConnell, Senator McConnell could not fault Citizens United for that. Senator McConnell opposed Citizens United’s motion to participate in that oral argument stating that ‘oral argument is not necessary on [Citizen United’s] claims because they ‘may readily be resolved on the briefs.'” Tit for tat.