This St. Petersburg Times article has a great beginning: Yard signs: $10,000. A week-long, statewide media buy: $1-million. An army of lawyers to challenge any election law that stands between you and a razor-thin victory: priceless.

Brandon Fail has written this timely student note in the Yale Law Journal. The author says the lesson is to lease, not purchase, election equipment.

Seth Stern has written an interesting piece at CQ.com, but it is only for subscribers and I don’t have a link.

Ned Foley offers this comment at Moritz. The Mortiz website continues to update the flurry of pre-election (and soon to be during-election) litigation taking place throughout the country, especially the recent Ohio litigaton.

FAIRVote has this special report.

The following announcement arrived via email: Using the Courts to Win the Presidency: Learning from 2004 and Planning for 2008 Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 Time: 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. Location: Room 430 B/C, Fordham Law School 140 W.… Continue reading

Major news outlets have been running their stories on the possibility of post-election litigation in light of continued problems with both voting technology and new voting rules (both indirect results of the 2000 election debacle). As I’ve written in the… Continue reading

I’m scheduled to be on PRI’s “To The Point” later today. These things are always subject to change.

AP offers this report, which begins: “FRESNO – A federal judge ruled Friday that certification of local election results in five Merced County cities should be halted until two weeks after voters go to the polls, or until federal… Continue reading

Here at Votelaw.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution offers this report

Bob Bauer has this extensive new post.

You can find Michael Dorf’s latest Findlaw column here. I expressed some similar thoughts in this Oct. 24 Slate column.

The Washington Post offers this report. It references Meet Me In St. Louis?, a post of mine from last week.