Mark Sherman for AP: “The outcome could come down to whether the justices think that race was the motivating factor in the state’s 2012 redistricting or that Republicans merely tried to maximize their partisan advantage.”
He attended the argument and wrote up his thoughts: “Bottom line: there seemed to be more sympathy for Alabama’s position over that of the petitioners, but the Court was quite scattered at oral argument, and the opinion could be… Continue reading
Reuters: “The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared unsure how to resolve a challenge to a state legislature redistricting plan in Alabama that packed black voters into certain districts in a way that critics say diminishes their influence at… Continue reading
In my Slate piece and SCOTUSBlog preview of the Alabama redistricting case the Supreme Court hears Wednesday morning, I described the interesting position conservative Justices are put in by this case: it is not clear to me how the conservatives… Continue reading
Plaintiffs alleged that the legislature needed to use equal voter populations and not just equal total populations in each district. The three-judge court held that the total population measure is not constitutionally required.
This case was brought by Ed Blum’s … Continue reading