“Will the Court Kill the Gerrymander?”
Zachary Roth for the NYRB.
Category Archives: redistricting
Analysis: Supreme Court Agrees to Hear (Part of) Texas Redistricting Cases, But Not Partisan Gerrymandering; What Does It Mean, and What About North Carolina?
As expected, the Supreme Court today agreed to hear both the state and congressional Texas redistricting cases, consolidating them, postponing a decision on jurisdiction (more on that below), and likely (but not certainly) setting them up for argument in… Continue reading
Likely Coming Friday: A Supreme Court Order to Hear the Texas Redistricting Cases
Tomorrow is one of the last opportunities for the Supreme Court to set cases to be argued this term, which ends in late June. Last week during its private conference the Court considered whether or not to hear the state… Continue reading
“Court ruling adds even more uncertainty to North Carolina’s 2018 elections”
The State of Play on Partisan Gerrymandering Cases at the Supreme Court
There has been so much action on partisan gerrymandering recently, I thought it is worth gaming out what is likely to happen over the next few months in relation to a number of cases at, or heading, to SCOTUS.
Back… Continue reading
Three-Judge Federal Court, on 2-1 Vote, Rejects Partisan Gerrymandering Challenge to Pa. Congressional Districts Under the Elections Clause
Via the Brennan Center’s Agre v. Wolf page, there are the three opinions (the final one is the dissent):
Final Judgment (January 10, 2018)
Memorandum by Honorable Judge Smith (January 10, 2018)
Memorandum by Honorable Judge Shwartz (January 10,… Continue reading
“North Carolina Congressional Map Ruled Unconstitutionally Gerrymandered”
Profs. Grofman and Gaddie Team Up Again to Write Brief on Partisan Gerrymandering (This Time in Pa. Supreme Court Case)
You can read it at this link.
“Podcast: Gerrymandering and American democracy”
National Constitution Center:
In the Gill case this year, the Supreme Court might determine the constitutional future of partisan gerrymandering.
Scholars and advocates have been discussing the arguments at the heart of the case – as well as those involved… Continue reading
NC: “Redistricting hearing signals coming end to map-making saga”
WRAL:
GREENSBORO, N.C. — A long legal saga over North Carolina’s state legislative maps drew near an end Friday as a panel of federal judges heard closing arguments over which version of those maps to use during this year’s statehouse… Continue reading
“Two Ways of Looking at Gerrymandering”
Linda Greenhouse contrasting Benisk and Gill.
I did my own compare and contrast of the cases last month in the LA Times.
“Alarm at Proposal to Ask About Citizenship Status in Census”
Must-read NYT:
A request by the Justice Department to ask people about their citizenship status in the 2020 census is stirring a broad backlash from census experts and others who say the move could wreck chances for an accurate count… Continue reading
“How far into 2018 before NC knows shape of election districts in gerrymander case?”
News and Observer:
At the 9:30 a.m. hearing in Greensboro on Friday, the judges will hear arguments for and against Persily’s proposed election district changes in Cumberland, Guilford, Hoke, Mecklenburg, Wake, Bladen, Sampson and Wayne counties.
In his 69-page report… Continue reading
“In gerrymandering case, judge recommends Pa. Supreme Court uphold congressional map”
Philly Inquirer:
Commonwealth Court judge recommended Friday that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court uphold the state’s map of congressional districts in a high-profile gerrymandering lawsuit that challenges the map as unconstitutionally drawn to benefit Republicans.
Democrats hold a 5-2 majority on… Continue reading