Press release via email from the Southern Coalition for Social Justice:
On the eve of trial in the legal challenge to North Carolina’s oppressive Voter ID law, the General Assembly has capitulated, voting overwhelmingly in both houses to allow qualified… Continue reading
Guy Charles and Luis Fuentes-Rohwer have posted this draft on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
In Shelby County v. Holder, the Court struck down an important provision of the Voting Rights Act, section 4, on federalism grounds. The Court argued… Continue reading
Ellen Katz has posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming University of Chicago Legal Forum). here is the abstract:
Two years after Shelby County v. Holder and United States v. Windsor, a good deal of litigation has addressed the legality of… Continue reading
TPM:
Evenwel v. Abbott is the culmination of Blum’s decades long effort to take on racially-influenced redistricting, having failedtwice before with “one person, one vote” cases that stopped at the Supreme Court’s doorstep. It is expected to be… Continue reading
From the Cumberland Law Review:
The Cumberland Law Review is doggedly searching for articles, insights, and ideas that implicate a subject that we believe our journal is uniquely situated (and arguably obligated) to explore: a sort of retrospective of the… Continue reading
Zack Roth reports for MSNBC.
One interesting question is how any rule in Evenwel would match up with requirements of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
Tony Mauro
Edward Blum, the mastermind behind successful U.S. Supreme Court challenges to affirmative action and the federal Voting Rights Act, has done it again—this time, in a case that could reshape the way voting districts are drawn nationwide.
Press release:
Today the Department of Justice proposed legislation that would require states or localities whose territory includes part or all of an Indian reservation, an Alaska Native village, or other tribal lands to locate at least one polling… Continue reading
Melissa Marschall and Amanda Rutherford have written this article for AJPS. Here is the abstract:
This study applies insights from principal-agent models to examine whether and how the language assistance provisions of the Voting Rights Act, Sections 203 and 4(f)(4),… Continue reading