Check out the agenda and live stream.

This sentence appears in a NY Times oped today about anonymous comments on websites. I’m wondering whether anyone has looked at this literature and applied it to an argument in favor of campaign finance disclosure laws. Sounds like it might be a fruitful endeavor.

CCP blogs.

John Samples has written this post for the Cato-Unbound series (about to wind up at the end of the month) on campaign finance disclosure.

The San Diego Union Tribune offers this report. (Disclosure: I am one of the attorneys representing the City of San Diego in the litigation described in this article.)

WaPo reports.

Nelson Lund has posted this draft on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

“Missouri Plan” judicial selection mechanisms, which many states have adopted, seek to ensure that judges are appointed on the basis of “merit” rather than “politics.” These devices typically feature a judicial nominating commission comprising some lawyers and some lay members. The lay members are usually chosen by the governor, and the lawyers are frequently elected by the state bar.
Laws giving lawyers a legally preferred role in judicial selection sit very uneasily with basic tenets of republican government and political economy, though principles of federalism might counsel against federal interference with these state decisions about the structure of government. Whatever one thinks about those contending principles, however, the states are now governed by a well-settled body of equal protection doctrine that sharply limits their authority to hold elections from which some voters are excluded.
The inferior federal courts have uniformly upheld Missouri Plan devices against equal protection challenges, but all of the opinions have been poorly reasoned. This paper focuses on the Kansas version of merit selection, which gives lawyers a uniquely powerful role in selecting that state’s supreme court. The paper concludes that the Kansas system, which is now being challenged in federal court, is almost certainly unconstitutional under existing precedent.

This event is Wednesday.

Jay Weiner writes from the trenches.

That’s the title of the plenary session at this event at Marquette on Dec. 3.

The Rose Institute and Target Book will sponsor this event Dec. 8.

National Journal collects some reminiscences.

This Alaska Dispatch report is detailed and interesting.

NY Times
Washington Post
WSJ
LA Times
USA Today
Bloomberg
AP
National Law Journal
Christian Science Monitor