Politico reports here on a decision of the DC District Court, denying Judicial Watch’s request for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s records concerning campaign contributions.
Monthly Archives: September 2010
When Legislators Are Also Lawyers
Legal Ethics Forum has this post on the indictment of a former NJ state legislator, arising from money his law firm received, purportedly for legal services but really (the indictment alleges) for supporting a development project. The linked story reports that state law doesn’t require legislators to disclose their clients, the nature of their work, or how much they’re getting, thus opening the door to conflicts and even bribery.
Open Secrets’ “Races to Watch”
The Center for Responsive Politics opensecrets.org website has launched a two-week series on the money behind the 2010 congressional elections. It includes this story on Republicans’ financial advantages in races for open House seats.
Chief Justice Roberts Rejects “Tea Party” Candidate’s Petition
“Clear The Bench Colorado Subject To Contribution Limits, Judge Decides”
See here for a description of and link to an interesting ALJ decision from Colorado, mentioned in this NYT editorial. The decision concludes that a group advocating against the retention of state judges must register as a political committee, thus limiting it to contributions of $525 per person — but doesn’t address the First Amendment issue raised by this requirement, apparently because state ALJ’s aren’t permitted to do so.
NYC Elections Chief Defends Administration of Primary
The NYT reports here on the remarks of George Gonzalez, NYC Board of Elections ED, at a state senate hearing.
“Ballots Cast Before Election Day Expected to Increase as Early Voting Trend Continues Across the Nation”
The EAC has issued this release, noting that 30.3% of people vote early in 2008.
“Judges, Others Want Court to Weigh in on Judicial Campaign Speech”
National Law Journal reports here on challenges to judicial campaign speech limits in Indiana and Wisconsin, brought by Jim Bopp.
Wharton Conference on Citizens United
Tomorrow, the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania will be hosting a conference entitled “Citizens United and the Changing Political Role of the Corporation.” The program may be found here. Thanks to Rick Piides, who will be presenting at the opening session, for the pointer.
“Despite Dearth Of Evidence, Right Wing Voter Fraud Fear Machine Carries On”
TPMMuckraker reports.
University of Baltimore Election Law Symposium
Today, the University of Baltimore School of Law will host a symposium entitled “A Vision for Voting:
Celebrating 45 Years, Creating a Vision for the Future,” organized by Prof. Gilda Daniels. The agenda is here. The symposium includes panels on election administration, redistricting, and campaign finance (the last of which I’ll be on).
PPIC Releases Fascinating Poll of CA Public Opinion; No Question on Redistricting Measures (Prop. 20 and 27)
See here.
CA Gov. Vetoes Bill to Require Online Disclosure of Gifts to Legislators
See here.
“Democrats Find Many Big Donors Cutting Support”
The NY Times offers this front-page report, which discusses CU a fair bit.