“Calif. Justices Wade Into ‘Citizens United’ Scuffle”
The Recorder reports on yesterday’s oral argument.
Category Archives: direct democracy
“California’s initiative process needs reform — not repeal”
Bob Stern in the San Diego Union-Tribune:
Thus, any changes will be difficult to pass, but if I could amend the initiative process, here is what I would do:
Extend the number of days that a measure could be circulated… Continue reading
“A Loaf Full of Democracy”
Ciara Torres-Speilliscy on AZ redistricting.
“Judge Strikes Down California’s Ballot Initiative To Kill Gays”
BuzzFeed reports.
I haven’t seen any written opinion yet.
I am somewhat surprised given that courts in CA generally do not police initiatives for substantive unconstitutionality unless they pass. More when I can see an opinion.
UPDATE:
This may … Continue reading
The Ballot Measure Business is Big
CPI:
Active in the 26 states that have citizen-initiated ballot measures, the network of pollsters, direct mail specialists, lawyers, consultants, signature gatherers and voting data whizzes were paid at least $400 million for 85 statewide measures across the country… Continue reading
“Election Laws and Agenda Setting: How Election Law Restrictiveness Shapes the Complexity of State Ballot Measures”
Kerri Milita has written this article for State Politics and Policy Quarterly. Here is the abstract:
Recently, many U.S. states that allow citizen initiatives have passed laws designed to make it more difficult for an initiative to qualify for the… Continue reading
En Banc 9th Circuit Unanimously Rules No Anonymous Initiative Sponsors, Slams Role of Money in Initiative Process
You can find the ruling in the Chula Vista case here. This overturned an earlier panel decision, a result I expected. Now that the court has ruled this way, I think Supreme Court review is unlikely.
Footnote 11 is… Continue reading
“Ted Stevens Case Looms Over Menendez Indictment”
Mike Sacks reports for NLJ.
Fred Woocher Says A Court Could Well Kill the Shoots the Gays Initiative
In this post, I said I’d bet a court would order CA AG Kamala Harris to prepare a title and summary for the odious “shoot the gays” initiative. I base this on CA court cases refusing to engage in pre-election… Continue reading
CA AG Kamala Harris Does Not Want to Issue Title and Summary for Shoot the Gays Initiative
Statement.
But I bet a court orders who to do so. Further I bet she knows a court will order her to do so.
But much better to do it under a court order.
“‘Shoot the gays’ initiative likely to be circulated”
Bob Egelko reports for the SF Chronicle.
“The Supreme Court and the Power of the People”
Michael Li:
A good advocate tries to make things simple, and sitting through Monday’s U.S. Supreme Court hearing over the constitutionality of Arizona’s independent redistricting commission, it was clear — if there had been any doubt — that former… Continue reading
“Who Holds the Redistricting Power?”
National Constitution Center podcast:
Michael Morley and Nick Stephanopoulos join our Jeffrey Rosen to discuss an upcoming Supreme Court case from Arizona that could dramatically shape the future of the legislative redistricting process.
“Could the Supreme Court Make Dozens of State Election Laws Unconstitutional?”
Brennan Center with a nice interactive map on the initiatives which could be in trouble under the Arizona redistricting case.