Nick Stephanopoulos has posted this draft on SSRN (Harvard Law Review). Here is the abstract:
Why do Supreme Court opinions denounce some districts as political gerrymanders but say nothing about other superficially similar districts? Why does the Court deem some… Continue reading
Here. It concludes: “Lawsuits don’t mean the process has failed. It had some holes, and there is room for improvement. But its mission has been accomplished. The political parties no longer pick their voters.”
Tom Brunnell has posted this draft on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
Since the redistricting revolution of the 1960’s, which began with a series of Supreme Court decisions that forced states to draw equally populated districts for the U.S. House… Continue reading
Here, via Justin Levitt.
How to sell this one to a more Democratic state? Likely it will focus on the potential for tax increases under a 2/3 Democratic Senate.