In light of today’s Benisek argument, and at the risk of getting banished to another forum (I jest, I think), I offer a modest addition to the Pildes–Stephanopoulos discussion on partisan gerrymandering and the First Amendment. I agree… Continue reading

I have written this piece for Politico Magazine. It begins: On Wednesday, the Supreme Court hears arguments in Benisek v. Lamone, a case about whether Maryland violated the First Amendment rights of Republican voters by redrawing the state’s congressional districts… Continue reading

The following is a guest post from Professor Earl Maltz of Rutgers Law:   In a recent series of blog posts drawn from a forthcoming article in the Georgia Law Review, Professor Edward B. Foley argues that a successful constitutional… Continue reading

Lawrence Hurley for Reuters: Eyler, a retired business owner in the small town of Thurmont roughly 55 miles north of the U.S. capital, said he thinks he and others like him were being targeted by the Democrats because of their… Continue reading

The following is the fifth and final in a series of guest posts on Benisek v. Lamone by Ohio State’s Ned Foley. Edward B. Foley This blog essay is the last in a series derived from a contribution to… Continue reading

The following is the fourth in a series of guest posts on Benisek v. Lamone by Ohio State’s Ned Foley. Edward B. Foley This blog essay is the fourth in a series derived from a contribution to a University… Continue reading

Guy Charles and Luis Fuente-Rohwer have posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming, William and Mary Law Review). I agree with some but disagree with other key parts of this interesting and important paper. Here is the abstract: This article explores… Continue reading

The following is the third in a series of guest posts on Benisek v. Lamone by Ohio State’s Ned Foley. Edward B. Foley Originalism and Election Law (or, The Difference between Reynolds and Benisek) This blog essay is the… Continue reading

Howard’s got it.