As I explained in this post, the Chief Justice wrote only for a plurality in applying strict scutiny to the judicial campaign speech issue before it. Justice Ginsburg (and to some extent Justice Breyer) did not go along. But… Continue reading
In a surprise and very important development, the Supreme Court has rejected a First Amendment challenge to Florida’s ban on the personal solicitation of campaign contributions by judicial candidates. Even more surprising, the Court’s opinion (a plurality in part)… Continue reading
Matthew Saks:
Last week, the election law expert Rick Hasen wrote a piece in Slate criticizing Hillary Clinton for coming out in support of a constitutional amendment to get big money out of politics. He argued that a constitutional… Continue reading
I have written this piece for Slate. It begins:
In February, the Campaign Legal Center, a group which works on campaign finance reform issues, released a “white paper” contending that many of the leading potential presidential candidates were… Continue reading
Kevin Huguelet has posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming University of Miami Law Review). Here is the abstract:
This Article examines the current campaign finance jurisprudence in the United States, with a particular emphasis on the Court’s recognition of compelling… Continue reading
This order is unsurprising. Democrats and minority plaintiffs challenged a North Carolina redistricting plan as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The North Carolina Supreme Court rejected the challenge. Today the Supreme Court told North Carolina to take another look in light… Continue reading
Editorial:
The chief justice’s destructive cure for this was to throw out the formulaCongress devised in 1965 that required all or parts of 16 states with long histories of overt racial discrimination in voting, most in the South,… Continue reading