Justice Breyer Rejects Republicans’ Attempt to Scuttle Maine’s Use of Ranked Choice Voting in Upcoming Presidential Vote
He did not ask for a response. (I had thought there might be some interest at the Court in the issue presented there.)
Category Archives: Supreme Court
Reply Brief Filed in Pennsylvania Voting Case, Teeing Up Case for Supreme Court Order at Any Time
“A key fix for an unthinkable election disaster”
I have written this piece for CNN Opinion. It begins:
With coronavirus infections raging through the White House and the state of the President’s health unclear, it’s time to face up to an unsettling reality. We need to start thinking… Continue reading
In Unusual and Important Move, Democrats in Pennsylvania Voting Case Before Supreme Court Ask Court to Fully Resolve the Issues Before the Election. The Supreme Court Should Listen.
I wrote earlier today at Slate about the important case coming out of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Here’s part of what I wrote:
The final argument that Republicans are advancing is the boldest and perhaps most dangerous one. The argument… Continue reading
“US Supreme Court allows SC vote-by-mail restriction to proceed”
Ariane de Vogue for CNN.
Breaking and Analysis: Without noted dissent, Supreme Court reverses 4th Circuit and says South Carolina voters still need to provide witness signatures to cast absentee ballots (except for those who already voted and ballots received within 2 days)
You can find the order here.
As I explained today in Slate, “In South Carolina, a federal district court held that a requirement that those voting by mail obtain a witness signature unconstitutionally burdened voters’ rights during the… Continue reading
“This Will Be a Critical Week for Pandemic Voting Cases at the Supreme Court”
I have written this piece for Slate. It begins:
While the nation’s attention has been focused on the president’s COVID-19 diagnosis and the ensuing questions surrounding that, it’s important to remember there will still be an election in one month.… Continue reading
“Trump’s New Supreme Court Is Coming for the Next Dozen Elections”
I have written this piece for New York. It begins:
When Judge Amy Coney Barrett sits for questions before the Senate Judiciary Committee in mid-October, no doubt Democrats will pepper her with questions about whether she would recuse herself in… Continue reading
“Supreme Court begins 2020 term as a key election issue: Will it decide the election, too?”
Richard Wolf for USA Today.
“Case preview: Justices to consider Delaware rules on bipartisanship in judiciary”
Amy Howe for SCOTUSBlog:
The justices start their new term on Monday, at a time when the Supreme Court is at the center of a bitter battle over President Donald Trump’s nominee to succeed Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died… Continue reading
“Op-Ed: Why Judge Barrett’s legal philosophy is deeply antidemocratic”
Victoria Nourse LAT oped hits the nail on the head about textualism:
Many think that the appointment of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court will jeopardize the Affordable Care Act and abortion rights. But the reach of her… Continue reading
David Gans on the Purcell Principle in Slate
David:
In a string of unsigned, unexplained orders this summer, the Supreme Court has repeatedly shown that it will not protect the right to vote during an election year. The court has considered emergency motions in cases challenging voting or… Continue reading
Breaking: As Expected, The Supreme Court Will Hear Arizona “Ballot Harvesting” Case (After the Election)
News from today’s order list is no surprise. Here’s what I wrote back in January: “I strongly suspect that the Supreme Court will take this case, which reversed a lower court and a three-judge Ninth Circuit panel. A… Continue reading
South Carolina Election Officials, Republican Party Go to Supreme Court Seeking to Reinstate Absentee Ballot Witness Requirement Relaxed Thanks to Covid
The brief relies heavily on the Purcell Principle.