How Appealing and SCOTUSBlog have extensive roundups. For my writing on the case see this SCOTUSBlog preview this Slate commentary and this SCOTUSBlog oral argument analysis.

Marcia Coyle reports for the NLJ.

Bloomberg Law: Voting Clash at the Supreme Court (Audio) Nov 12, 2014 Richard Hasen, a professor at the University of California Irvine School of Law and a leading authority on election law, discusses oral arguments in the U.S. Supreme Court… Continue reading

Adam Liptak reports for the NY Times.

Emily Bazelon discusses on NPR’s Here and Now.

Here.

Mark Sherman for AP: “The outcome could come down to whether the justices think that race was the motivating factor in the state’s 2012 redistricting or that Republicans merely tried to maximize their partisan advantage.”

Bob Barnes for WaPo: “The Supreme Court seemed divided Wednesday over and perhaps even stumped by a request that Alabama redo its state legislative redistricting plan that challengers said was drawn with too much emphasis on the race of voters.”

He attended the argument and wrote up his thoughts: “Bottom line: there seemed to be more sympathy for Alabama’s position over that of the petitioners, but the Court was quite scattered at oral argument, and the opinion could be… Continue reading

Reuters: “The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared unsure how to resolve a challenge to a state legislature redistricting plan in Alabama that packed black voters into certain districts in a way that critics say diminishes their influence at… Continue reading

In my Slate piece and SCOTUSBlog preview of the Alabama redistricting case the Supreme Court hears Wednesday morning, I described the interesting position conservative Justices are put in by this case: it is not clear to me how the conservatives… Continue reading

USA Today reports.