Category Archives: political polarization
“What the Filibuster Rule Changes, and What It Doesn’t”
NYT Room for Debate:
Maybe Now We’ll See Some Action
Gregory Koger, author, “Filibustering: A Political History of Obstruction in the House and Senate”
These ‘Reforms’ Are a Huge Mistake
Richard A. Arenberg, co-author, “Defending the Filibuster”
The Way … Continue reading
More Sarah Binder on the Filibuster Change
“Filibuster Vote Just Tip of Dysfunction Iceberg”
Some Smart Commentary on the Filibuster Today
The (Partial) End of the Filibuster as a Natural Consequence of Increased Polarization in the Senate
It’s a subject I addressed in Political Dysfunction and Constitutional Change, 86 Drake Law Review (2013) (symposium).
Shorter version: pretty clear this was coming. Big question was who would pull the trigger.
Norm Ornstein: Sen. McConnell Secretly Wanted Reid to Break Filibuster
Three Democrats Voting Against Going Nuclear on Judicial/Executive Nominations
Race or Party? Cont’d
“We’re Not Bluffing”
The end of the filibuster of judicial nominees Thursday?
What I think has changed in the last few years is the calculation on the downside of going nuclear. How can Sen. McConnell plausibly threaten to make things worse if Democrats… Continue reading
Will Harry Reid Go Nuclear?
If not, he’s a good bluffer.
Mara Liasson Drinks the Open Primary/Redistricting Commission Kool-Aid
Like Adam Nagourney before her, NPR’s Mara Liasson manages to do a story on whether open primary and redistricting reform in California cures hyperpartisanship without quoting the political scientists (such as Seth Masket, Thad Kousser and others) who actually study… Continue reading
“Bills left in limbo are often just part of the choreography in Congress”
“U.S. Electoral System and Congressional Gridlock”
Watch Rob Richie on C-SPAN.