Election Law Blog
Rick Hasen's blog
Skip to content
Election Law Blog
← “Pro-Obama group says it’s not partisan, but has wide latitude”
“Watch Out in the Covered Jurisdictions” →

Crossroad GPS’s Tax Status Still in Limbo

Posted on February 7, 2013 5:13 pm by Rick Hasen

Ken Vogel tweets.

Share
This entry was posted in campaign finance, tax law and election law. Bookmark the permalink.
← “Pro-Obama group says it’s not partisan, but has wide latitude”
“Watch Out in the Covered Jurisdictions” →

Comments are closed.

  • Have a Comment?

    E-Mail Me at rhasen-AT-law.uci.edu

    Election Law Blogger
    Rick Hasen (posts)

    Guest Bloggers
    Heather Gerken (posts)
    Justin Levitt (posts)
    Nate Persily (posts)
    Rick Pildes (posts)
    Dan Tokaji (posts)
  • Generously Supported By


    UCI School of Law
  • ELB Feeds and Email Subscriptions


    Follow rickhasen on Twitter

    Follow Election Law Blog on FaceBook

    RSS Feed RSS XML

    Get ELB Delivered by E-Mail to Your In-box via Feedburner

  • Books by Rick


    The Voting Wars: From Florida 2000 to the Next Election Meltdown (Yale University Press, 2012)
    thevotingwars.gif

    The Voting Wars Website

    NOW AVAILABLE from
    Amazon
    Barnes and Noble


    electionlaw.gif

    Election Law--Cases and Materials (5th edition 2012) (with Daniel Hays Lowenstein and Daniel P. Tokaji)
    supremecourt.gif

    The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore (NYU Press 2003) NOW IN PAPER
    Book introduction
    Table of Contents
    Order from Amazon.com
    Order from BarnesandNoble.com
    Journal of Legislation Symposium on book


    ggtorts.gif

    The Glannon Guide to Torts: Learning Torts Through Multiple-Choice Questions and Analysis (Aspen Publishers 2d ed. 2011)


    Remedies: Examples & Explanations by Richard L. Hasen

    Remedies: Examples & Explanations (Aspen Publishers, 2d ed. 2010)


  • Election Law Resources


    Election Law--Cases and Materials (4th edition 2008) (with Daniel Hays Lowenstein and Daniel P. Tokaji)
    Election Law Journal
    Election Law Listserv homepage
    Election Law Teacher Database
    Repository of Election Law Teaching Materials (2011 update)

  • Blogroll/Political News Sites


    All About Redistricting (Justin Levitt)
    American Constitution Society
    Balkinization
    Ballot Access News
    Brennan Center for Justice
    The Brookings Institution's Campaign Finance Page
    Buzzfeed Politics
    California Election Law (Randy Riddle)
    Caltech-MIT/Voting Technology Project (and link to voting technology listserv)
    The Caucus (NY Times)
    Campaign Legal Center (Blog)
    Campaign Finance Institute
    Center for Competitive Politics (Blog)
    Center for Governmental Studies
    Doug Chapin (HHH program)
    Concurring Opinions
    CQ Politics
    Demos
    Election Updates
    Fairvote
    Election Law@Moritz
    Electionline.org
    Equal Vote (Dan Tokaji)
    Federal Election Commission
    The Fix (WaPo)
    The Hill

    How Appealing
    Initiative and Referendum Institute
    Legal Theory (Larry Solum)
    Political Activity Law
    Political Wire
    Politico
    Prawfsblawg
    Roll Call
    SCOTUSblog
    Summary Judgments (Loyola Law faculty blog)
    Talking Points Memo
    UC Irvine Center for the Study of Democracy
    UC Irvine School of Law
    USC-Caltech Center for the Study of Law and Politics
    The Volokh Conspiracy
    Votelaw blog (Ed Still)
    Washington Post Politics
    Why Tuesday?

  • Recent Newspapers and Magazine Commentaries


    Big Money Lost, But Don't Be Relieved, CNN Opinion, Nov. 9, 2012

    A Better Way to Vote: Nationalize Oversight and Control, NY Times, "Room for Debate" blog, Nov. 9, 2012

    Election Day Dispatches Entry 5: Black Panthers, Navy Seals, and Mysterious Voting Machines, Slate, Nov. 6, 2012

    Behind the Voting Wars, A Clash of Philosophies, Sacramento Bee, Nov. 4, 2012

    How Many More Near-Election Disasters Before Congress Wakes Up?, The Daily Beast, Oct. 30, 2012

    Will Bush v. Gore Save Barack Obama? If Obama Narrowly Wins Ohio, He Can Thank Scalia and the Court's Conservatives, Slate, Oct. 26, 2012

    Will Voter Suppression and Dirty Tricks Swing the Election?, Salon, Oct. 22, 2012

    Is the Supreme Court About to Swing Another Presidential Election? If the Court Cuts Early Voting in Ohio, It Could Be a Difference Maker in the Buckeye State, Slate, Oct. 15, 2012

    Election Truthers: Will Republicans Accept an Obama Election Victory?, Slate, Oct. 9, 2012

    Wrong Number: The Crucial Ohio Voting Battle You Haven't Heard About, Slate, Oct. 1, 2012

    Litigating the Vote, National Law Journal, Aug. 27, 2012

    Military Voters as Political Pawns, San Diego Union-Tribune, August 19, 2012

    Tweeting the Next Election Meltdown: If the Next Presidential Election Goes into Overtime, Heaven Help Us. It’s Gonna Get Ugly, Slate, Aug. 14, 2012

    A Detente Before the Election, New York Times, August 5, 2012

    Worse Than Watergate: The New Campaign Finance Order Puts the Corruption of the 1970s to Shame, Slate, July 19, 2012

    Has SCOTUS OK'd Campaign Dirty Tricks?, Politico, July 10, 2012

    End the Voting Wars: Take our elections out of the hands of the partisan and the incompetent, Slate, June 13, 2012

    Citizens: Speech, No Consequences, Politico, May 31, 2012

    Is Campaign Disclosure Heading Back to the Supreme Court? Don’t expect to see Karl Rove’s Rolodex just yet, Slate, May 16, 2012

    Unleash the Hounds Why Justice Souter should publish his secret dissent in Citizens United, Slate, May 16, 2012

    Why Washington Can’t Be Fixed; And is about to get a lot worse, Slate, May 9, 2012

    Let John Edwards Go! Edwards may be a liar and a philanderer, but his conviction will do more harm than good, Slate, April 23, 2012

    The Real Loser of the Scott Walker Recall? The State of Wisconsin, The New Republic, April 13, 2012

    A Court of Radicals: If the justices strike down Obamacare, it may have grave political implications for the court itself, Slate, March 30, 2012

    Of Super PACs and Corruption, Politico, March 22, 2012

    Texas Voter ID Law May Be Headed to the Supreme Court, Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Mar. 13, 2012

    “The Numbers Don’t Lie: If you aren’t sure Citizens United gave rise to the Super PACs, just follow the money, Slate, Mar. 9, 2012

    Stephen Colbert: Presidential Kingmaker?, Politico, Mar. 5 2012

    Occupy the Super PACs; Justice Ginsburg knows the Citizens United decision was a mistake. Now she appears to be ready to speak truth to power, Slate, Feb. 20, 2012

    Kill the Caucuses! Maine, Nevada, and Iowa were embarrassing. It’s time to make primaries the rule, Slate, Feb. 15, 2012

    The Biggest Danger of Super PACs, CNN Politics, Jan. 9, 2012

    This Case is a Trojan Horse, New York Times "Room for Debate" blog, Jan. 6, 2012 (forum on Bluman v. FEC)

    Holder's Voting Rights Gamble: The Supreme Court's Voter ID Showdown, Slate, Dec. 30, 2011

    Will Foreigners Decide the 2012 Election? The Extreme Unintended Consequences of Citizens United, The New Republic (online), Dec. 6, 2011

    Disenfranchise No More, New York Times, Nov. 17, 2011

    A Democracy Deficit at Americans Elect?, Politico, Nov. 9, 2011

    Super-Soft Money: How Justice Kennedy paved the way for ‘SuperPACS’ and the return of soft money, Slate, Oct. 25, 2012

    The Arizona Campaign Finance Law: The Surprisingly Good News in the Supreme Court’s New Decision, The New Republic (online), June 27, 2011

    New York City as a Model?, New York Times Room for Debate, June 27, 2011

    A Cover-Up, Not a Crime. Why the Case Against John Edwards May Be Hard to Prove, Slate, Jun. 3, 2011

    Wisconsin Court Election Courts Disaster, Politico, Apr. 11, 2011

    Rich Candidate Expected to Win Again, Slate, Mar. 25, 2011

    Health Care and the Voting Rights Act, Politico, Feb. 4, 2011

    The FEC is as Good as Dead, Slate, Jan. 25, 2011

    Let Rahm Run!, Slate, Jan. 24, 2011

    Lobbypalooza,The American Interest, Jan-Feb. 2011(with Ellen P. Aprill)

    Election Hangover: The Real Legacy of Bush v. Gore, Slate, Dec. 3, 2010

    Alaska's Big Spelling Test: How strong is Joe Miller's argument against the Leeza Markovsky vote?, Slate, Nov. 11, 2010

    Kirk Offers Hope vs. Secret Donors, Politico, November 5, 2010

    Evil Men in Black Robes: Slate's Judicial Election Campaign Ad Spooktackular!, Slate, October 26, 2010 (with Dahlia Lithwick)

    Show Me the Donors: What's the point of disclosing campaign donations? Let's review, Slate, October 14, 2010

    Un-American Influence: Could Foreign Spending on Elections Really Be Legal?, Slate, October 11, 2010

    Toppled Castle: The real loser in the Tea Party wins is election reform, Slate, Sept. 16, 2010

    Citizens United: What the Court Did--and Why, American Interest, July/August 2010

    The Big Ban Theory: Does Elena Kagan Want to Ban Books? No, and She Might Even Be a Free Speech Zealot", Slate, May 24, 2010

    Crush Democracy But Save the Kittens: Justice Alito's Double Standard for the First Amendment, Slate, Apr. 30, 2010

    Some Skepticism About the "Separable Preferences" Approach to the Single Subject Rule: A Comment on Cooter & Gilbert, Columbia Law Review Sidebar, Apr. 19, 2010

    Scalia's Retirement Party: Looking ahead to a conservative vacancy can help the Democrats at the polls, Slate, Apr. 12, 2010

    Hushed Money: Could Karl Rove's New 527 Avoid Campaign-Finance Disclosure Requirements?, Slate, Apr. 6, 2010

    Money Grubbers: The Supreme Court Kills Campaign Finance Reform, Slate, Jan. 21, 2010

    Bad News for Judicial Elections, N.Y. Times "Room for Debate" Blog, Jan., 21, 2010

    Read more opeds from 2006-2009

  • Forthcoming Publications, Recent Articles, and Working Papers


    The 2012 Voting Wars, Judicial Backstops, and the Resurrection of Bush v. Gore, George Washington Law Review (forthcoming 2013) (draft available)

    A Constitutional Right to Lie in Campaigns and Elections?, Montana Law Review (forthcoming 2013) (draft available)

    End of the Dialogue? Political Polarization, the Supreme Court, and Congress, 86 Southern California Law Review (forthcoming 2013) (draft available)

    Fixing Washington, 126 Harvard Law Review (forthcoming 2012) (draf available)

    What to Expect When You’re Electing: Federal Courts and the Political Thicket in 2012, Federal Lawyer, (forthcoming 2012)( draft available)

    Chill Out: A Qualified Defense of Campaign Finance Disclosure Laws in the Internet Age, Journal of Law and Politics (forthcoming 2012) (draft available)

    Lobbying, Rent Seeking, and the Constitution, 64 Stanford Law Review (forthcoming 2012) (draft available)

    Anticipatory Overrulings, Invitations, Time Bombs, and Inadvertence: How Supreme Court Justices Move the Law, Emory Law Journal (forthcoming 2012) (draft available)

    Teaching Bush v. Gore as History, St. Louis University Law Review (forthcoming 2012) (symposium on teaching election law) (draft available)

    The Supreme Court’s Shrinking Election Law Docket: A Legacy of Bush v. Gore or Fear of the Roberts Court?, Election Law Journal (forthcoming 2011) (draft available)

    Citizens United and the Orphaned Antidistortion Rationale, 27 Georgia State Law Review 989 (2011) (symposium on Citizens United)

    The Nine Lives of Buckley v. Valeo, in First Amendment Stories, Richard Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, eds., Foundation 2011)

    The Transformation of the Campaign Financing Regime for U.S. Presidential Elections, in The Funding of Political Parties (Keith Ewing, Jacob Rowbottom, and Joo-Cheong Tham, eds., Routledge 2011)

    Judges as Political Regulators: Evidence and Options for Institutional Change, in Race, Reform and Regulation of the Electoral Process, (Gerken, Charles, and Kang eds., Cambridge 2011)

    Citizens United and the Illusion of Coherence, 109 Michigan Law Review 581 (2011)

    Aggressive Enforcement of the Single Subject Rule, 9 Election Law Journal 399 (2010) (co-authored with John G. Matsusaka)

    The Benefits of the Democracy Canon and the Virtues of Simplicity: A Reply to Professor Elmendorf, 95 Cornell Law Review 1173 (2010)

    Constitutional Avoidance and Anti-Avoidance on the Roberts Court, 2009 Supreme Court Review 181 (2010)

    Election Administration Reform and the New Institutionalism, California Law Review 1075 (2010) (reviewing Gerken, The Democracy Index)

    You Don't Have to Be a Structuralist to Hate the Supreme Court's Dignitary Harm Election Law Cases, 64 University of Miami Law Review 465 (2010)

    The Democracy Canon, 62 Stanford Law Review 69 (2009)

    Review Essay: Assessing California's Hybrid Democracy, 97 California Law Review 1501 (2009)

    Bush v. Gore and the Lawlessness Principle: A Comment on Professor Amar, 61 Florida Law Review 979 (2009)

    Introduction: Developments in Election Law, 42 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 565 (2009)

    Book Review (reviewing Christopher P. Manfredi and Mark Rush, Judging Democracy (2008)), 124 Political Science Quarterly 213 (2009).

    "Regulation of Campaign Finance," in Vikram Amar and Mark Tushnet, Global Perspectives on Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press (2009)

    More Supply, More Demand: The Changing Nature of Campaign Financing for Presidential Primary Candidates (working paper, Sept. 2008)

    When 'Legislature' May Mean More than''Legislature': Initiated Electoral College Reform and the Ghost of Bush v. Gore, 35 Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 599 (2008) (draft available)

    "Too Plain for Argument?" The Uncertain Congressional Power to Require Parties to Choose Presidential Nominees Through Direct and Equal Primaries, 102 Northwestern University Law Review 2009 (2008)

    Political Equality, the Internet, and Campaign Finance Regulation, The Forum, Vol. 6, Issue 1, Art. 7 (2008)

    Justice Souter: Campaign Finance Law's Emerging Egalitarian, 1 Albany Government Law Review 169 (2008)

    Beyond Incoherence: The Roberts Court's Deregulatory Turn in FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, 92 Minnesota Law Review 1064 (2008) (draft available)

    The Untimely Death of Bush v. Gore, 60 Stanford Law Review 1 (2007)

    Articles 2004-2007

  • About Rick Hasen


    Rick Hasen's home page at UC Irvine School of Law

    Contact Rick by e-mail

    2005 Profile of Rick in the Los Angeles Daily Journal

    2002 Profile of Rick in the Los Angeles Daily Journal

    Crescat Sententia's 20 Question interview with me

  • Disclosure: My role in some litigation/election issues


    I am consulting in Nevada Ethics Commission v. Carrigan

    I am one of the lawyers for the City of San Diego in the Thalheimer campaign contributions challenge

    The pro bono brief I've filed in the Crawford (Indiana voter identification case) in the Supreme Court

    The pro bono amicus brief of Richard Briffault and Rick Hasen in the Wisconsin Right to Life case in the Supreme Court

    My pro bono amicus letter in 9th Circuit supporting defendants' request for rehearing in Padilla v. Lever

    I am consulting for the California Nurses Association on their campaign finance initiative (Proposition 89) (see also Yes on 89)

    I do some consulting work with Horvitz & Levy, LLP

    My pro bono amicus letter in 9th Circuit supporting plaintiffs in Monterey initiative case

    My motion to file amicus brief/amicus brief supporting appellants in the ACLU punch card recall case

    United States Supreme Court amicus brief that I wrote for the Center for Governmental Studies in the BCRA case

  • Archives

  • Categories

    • absentee ballots (105)
    • alternative voting systems (63)
    • ballot access (180)
    • bribery (43)
    • Bush v. Gore reflections (39)
    • campaign finance (3676)
    • campaigns (612)
    • chicanery (496)
    • citizen commissions (116)
    • conflict of interest laws (170)
    • cumulative voting (3)
    • Department of Justice (278)
    • direct democracy (68)
    • election administration (2347)
    • Election Assistance Commission (27)
    • election law "humor" (62)
    • election law and constitutional law (2)
    • election law biz (79)
    • Elections Clause (18)
    • electoral college (118)
    • ethics investigations (95)
    • federal election commission (65)
    • felon voting (33)
    • Fixing Election Administration (10)
    • fraudulent fraud squad (180)
    • guest blogging election law scholarship (6)
    • internet voting (28)
    • John Edwards (82)
    • judicial elections (154)
    • legislation and legislatures (454)
    • lobbying (268)
    • military voting (59)
    • NVRA (motor voter) (47)
    • pedagogy (35)
    • petition clause (4)
    • petition signature gathering (19)
    • political equality (2)
    • political parties (280)
    • political polarization (133)
    • primaries (171)
    • provisional ballots (85)
    • recall elections (158)
    • recounts (46)
    • redistricting (729)
    • referendum (30)
    • Remedies (14)
    • residency (44)
    • social media and social protests (40)
    • SOS White (44)
    • Speech or Debate Clause (5)
    • statutory interpretation (44)
    • Supreme Court (655)
    • tax law and election law (427)
    • term limits (5)
    • The Voting Wars (1866)
    • theory (13)
    • third parties (147)
    • Torts (4)
    • Uncategorized (18896)
    • vote buying (16)
    • voter id (777)
    • voter initiatives (3)
    • voter registration (273)
    • voting (297)
    • Voting Rights Act (1000)
    • voting technology (101)
    • vra renewal guest blogging (108)
  • SiteMeter

© 2013 - Election Law Blog
Proudly powered by WordPress. Weaver by WPWeaver.info