ELB readers might be interested in this roundup of various law and democracy issues from the Expand Democracy team.
Brennan Center Releases Local Election Officials Survey
You can download a PDF of the report at this link.
Could the Texas Mid-Decade Redistricting Scheme Backfire?
This article from Politico, quoting Democratic lawmakers, makes the case.
From the article:
A Donald Trump-backed effort to gerrymander Texas would boost the GOP’s attempts to cling to its razor-thin House majority in next year’s midterms — but it also runs a serious risk of backfiring.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott asked the state legislature to redraw the map during its special session this summer, following a push from the White House and the Justice Department. Ohio is also required by state law to redraw its lines before next year’s midterms. Taken together, Republicans see an opportunity to potentially create more GOP seats, guarding against the possibility of a blue wave in 2026.
But in Texas, Republicans are in danger of creating a so-called dummymander, whereby an attempt to draw more seats for one party accidentally benefits the other. Texas’ congressional map already heavily favors the GOP, so any changes to further benefit the party would have to walk a careful line. Adding Republican voters to blue districts to reduce Democrats’ margins means taking those same voters out of the red districts where they reside. The result is more competitive districts across the board — ones Democrats hope to take advantage of as they harness anti-Trump energy in the midterms.
Former NJ Governors, Whitman and Corzine, Urge New Jersey Supreme Court to Lead the Way
Christine Whitman (R) and Jon Corzine (D) urge the New Jersey Supreme Court to lead the way in reducing the cycle of polarization. In an opinion piece, the two former Governors of New Jersey explain how recognizing the constitutional burdens anti-fusion laws place on minor parties is a meaningful path to undoing the pathologies of hyperpolarization and undercutting the appeal of authoritarianism. They write:
“Governance is failing because politics is failing, and politics is failing because our two major parties are no longer the ‘big tents’ they once were. There used to be liberal, moderate and conservative factions in both the Democratic and Republican parties, but now those are long gone. We have sorted ourselves into two distinct tribes, and, for too many Americans, the rival camp is seen as an existential threat that must be degraded and destroyed. Negotiation is for weaklings; compromise is surrender. Nothing but domination is acceptable, and that cuts at the very heart of this wondrous but fragile system known as democracy.
Litigation in New Jersey challenging the state’s anti-fusion laws could–if the Court accepts the case–help break the cycle.
By definition, fusion encourages inter-party coalitions to form, which adds stability and legitimacy to governance. It also punishes extremism, because it allows major party voters who are dismayed by the direction of their traditional party — and may currently feel they have nowhere to go — to build a new one.
. . . .
It gives us pride to imagine that the Garden State might lead the way to a better political party system and a more representative and effective government.
Theoretically, the New Jersey state legislature could solve the problem by simply repealing the ban. Still, as these two savvy politicians understand, self-interest makes “[d]ominant parties… generally unwilling to change the rules in order to allow new centers of power to breathe.”
Two Events Commemorating the 50th Anniversary of Section 203 (the Language Provisions) of the Voting Rights Act
Announcement via email:
The ACLU SoCal, ALC, CA Common Cause, and PANA are excited to share that registration is now open for “More Voices, Stronger Democracy: The 50th Anniversary of Section 203,” a statewide summit on language access and voting rights in California.
First up: The Pre-Summit Webinar (virtual)
Get grounded in the history, impact, and future of Section 203 before the Summit begins. This virtual event will feature reflections from leaders who helped secure the original passage and reauthorizations of this landmark provision of the Voting Rights Act. Panelists will offer unique perspectives on the law’s implementation, enforcement, and the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead for building a truly multilingual democracy.
Panelists:
- Henry Der, former Executive Director of Chinese for Affirmative Action
- Karen Narasaki, former Commissioner, US Commission on Civil Rights
- Rosalind Gold, Chief Public Policy Officer with NALEO Educational Fund
- Jim Tucker, Section 203 Enforcement Attorney
- Angelo Ancheta, Senior Research and Policy Counsel with Demos
Webinar Date: August 6, 2025
Register Here: https://tinyurl.com/203-webinar
More Voices, Stronger Democracy: The 50th Anniversary of Section 203 (in person)
We’ll be bringing together advocates, organizers, elections officials, and community leaders to reflect on 50 years of Section 203, elevate the voices of limited-English proficient voters, and strategize for the future of multilingual democracy. Panels will cover implementation, new research, advocacy, and organizing efforts from across the state.
- Opening Remarks: Shirley N. Weber, Ph.D., California Secretary of State
- Keynote: Xavier Becerra, Former U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services; Former California Attorney General
Summit Date: August 26, 2025
Location: The California Endowment, Sacramento
Event Info & Registration: https://tinyurl.com/Section-203
Texas Mid-Decade Redistricting and DOJ Letter
Harmeet Dhillon, the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, and Michael Gates, the Deputy Assistant Attorney General, have sent this letter to Texas Governor Greg Abbott and Ken Paxton, the Texas Attorney General, warning that four of the State’s congressional districts are unconstitutional.
Three of the four districts are represented by a person of color—two African Americans and one Latina: Al Green, Sylvia Garcia, and Marc Veasey. The fourth district is currently vacant after its representative, Sylvester Turner, died in office.
The DOJ’s letter declares that the districts “constitute unconstitutional ‘coalition districts’ and we urge the State of Texas to rectify these race-based considerations from these specific districts.” The letter cites cases, though its legal analysis is superficial. Its evident purpose is to provide a justification for Texas if it redraws those four districts. Governor Abbott’s decision to include congressional redistricting on the legislative agenda is ostensibly a response to the constitutional concerns raised by the DOJ.