A local Republican election official in Michigan has promised to certify the results of the November presidential election after being sued for stating that he wouldn’t sign off on the results if he disagreed with how the election was run.
The lawsuit, filed last week by the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan, came after a Detroit News article quoted Kalamazoo County Board of Canvassers member Robert Froman saying he believed the 2020 election was “most definitely” stolen and that he wouldn’t certify the upcoming November presidential results if a similar situation occurred this year. In a sworn affidavit signed Monday, Froman agreed to certify the results of the 2024 election based solely on vote returns and that he would not “refuse to certify election results based on information extrinsic to the statements of return.”…
A Michigan law passed in 2023 makes clear that canvassers have a “ministerial, clerical, and nondiscretionary duty” to certify election results based solely on the election returns.
Still, some Republican officials have attempted to take matters in their own hands. In May, two Republican members of a county canvassing board in the state’s Upper Peninsula refused to sign off on the results of an election that led to the recall of three GOP members of the county commission. They eventually relented after receiving a letter from state Elections Director Jonathan Brater, which reminded them of their duties and warned them of the consequences of failing to certify.
The Top Stories on Google News Right Now When You Search for “Voter Fraud”
Marc Elias Attacks the Pro-Voter Campaign Legal Center for Sticking Up for Campaign Finance Disclosure and Transparency (Because It Filed a Complaint Against a Democratic Super PAC)
The Campaign Legal Center does excellent, non-partisan work supporting voters’ rights, regardless of party.
Rep. Byron Donalds Demands that PA Permit Election Officials to Pre-Process Absentee Ballots
In the first one to two minutes of this clip, Republican Rep. Donalds lambasts PA for not permitting officials to start processing absentee ballots before Election Day. He notes that his state of Florida, along with Georgia and many others, permit this, which is why they can get to a more complete count more quickly than PA. Rep. Donalds is right about this( the way @atrupar excerpts the dialogue does not capture this part of the conversation) .
The Republican controlled Senate has refused to permit this unless the Democrats, including the Governor, agree to accept a voter ID law. This same partisan gamesmanship is why PA failed to permit pre-processing last time around, which is part of the reason PA’s vote count could not get closer to completion earlier in 2020 — with all the consequences that followed.
JD Vance Would Not Have Certified the 2020 Presidential Election as VP, Would Have Tried to Subvert Election Outcome
Sept. 17 Live Event from Safeguarding Democracy Project at UCLA Hammer Museum: “Democracy and Risks to the 2024 Elections”
Very much looking forward to moderating this event (recording will be made available after the event):
Sept. 17: Democracy and Risks to the 2024 Elections |
Tuesday, September 17, 7:30pm PT at the UCLA Hammer Museum, (Recording to Follow) Co-presented with the Hammer Forum and the David J. Epstein Program in Public Interest Law & Policy, UCLA Law Can the United States conduct a free and fair election in November in which the public will have confidence? Are concerns about foreign interference, deep fakes, and disinformation serious or overblown? Is participation equally open to minority voters? What are the risks to U.S. democracy if significant portions of the public do not accept the election results as legitimate? Moderated by Rick Hasen, UCLA Law. Panelists: Leah Aden, NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund; John Fortier, American Enterprise Institute; Justin Levitt, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles; Yoel Roth, The Match Group. |