….and they do once again to the WSJ editorial page.

Not only would I like to see the claims vetted more widely by a less ideological group of journalists (or at least a more diverse group of journalists), I’m still waiting to see evidence that (1) the tactics used here were more intrusive than those used with the investigation of other white collar criminals and (2) worse tactics were used because of the targeting of political opponents.

I don’t see either of those things in the WSJ ed. piece.