Ned Foley has written this important commentary for law.com. It concludes: “We must hope, then, that the indecisiveness of this year’s election law cases is nothing more than the first-term jitters of an understandably cautious Roberts Court. We can anticipate the Court acting more decisively the next time it considers a campaign finance or redistricting case. But much more importantly, as a nation, we can and should collectively plead that the Court rule definitively whenever it has occasion to entertain a follow-up to Bush v. Gore concerning the applicability of the Equal Protection Clause to the vote-counting process.”