<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Election Law</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/</link>
<description>The law of politics and the politics of law: election law, campaign finance, legislation, voting rights, initiatives, redistricting, and the Supreme Court nomination process
Rick Hasen&apos;s web log</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Rick.Hasen@lls.edu</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-09T16:17:52-08:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.2" />
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>

<item>
<title>Koppelman and Bernstein on Bush v. Gore</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010781.html</link>
<description>At Balkinization, Andrew Koppelman writes On Not Getting Over it, which begins: &quot;A few days ago, Justice Antonin Scalia, asked again about the charge of partisanship in the Supreme Court&apos;s decision in Bush v. Gore to hand the presidency to...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10781@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-09T16:17:52-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Voter ID and Election Fraud: A Non-Fix to a Non-Problem?&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010780.html</link>
<description>Jack Chin has this post at Prawfsblawg....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10780@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-09T16:11:58-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Lawyers: Gore&apos;s Pelosi Ad May Violate Election Law&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010779.html</link>
<description>This interesting article appears in the NY Sun. I spoke to this reporter about this article, but told him I don&apos;t know enough about the coordinated expenditure rules to comment on that aspect of it. It does seem to me...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10779@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-09T08:53:59-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>No Explanation Given to Commissioner Mason for Being Thrown Under the Bus</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010778.html</link>
<description>CQ Politics reports that FEC Commissioner Mason &quot;said the White House personnel office called him &apos;the day they withdrew the nomination to inform me about that. And that was a pretty routine process, just a courtesy call to me. And...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10778@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T21:20:20-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Trevor Potter&apos;s Comments on Election Law Listserv About  the Dumping of Commissioner Mason Appear in Tomorrow&apos;s NY Times</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010777.html</link>
<description>The Times article is here. Trevor&apos;s listserv comments were reposted on this blog here. And it started with the question I posed to Trevor at the beginning of that post....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10777@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T19:51:15-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Senators Feinstein and Kerry Express Concerns About Apparent Reversal in Department of Veterans&apos; Affairs Policy in Providing Access to Voter Registration for Veterans&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010776.html</link>
<description>See this press release and this AlterNet story....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10776@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T15:25:37-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Post-Crawford Movement on Voter ID in the States</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010775.html</link>
<description>There&apos;s a nice summary paragraph in &quot;Election Reform News This Week&quot; in the new Electionline weekly. Note that the beginning of the newsletter provides details on how current and new subscribers can sign up under a new procedure to receive...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10775@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T13:42:25-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;McCain Lawyer: FEC Flap &apos;Manufactured&apos;&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010774.html</link>
<description>The Politico offers this report....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10774@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T13:12:33-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Why Clinton Stands to Lose Millions&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010773.html</link>
<description>This interesting report in U.S. News notes a provision in McCain-Feingold that will be very important if Sen. Clinton wishes to recoup her campaign loan. See also this Explainer column from Slate....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10773@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T13:10:20-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>AEI-Brookings Task Force Report on EAC Voting Recommendations</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010772.html</link>
<description>See here....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10772@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T13:06:54-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Did Rush Limbaugh Tilt the Vote in Indiana?&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010771.html</link>
<description>The Washington Post offers this report....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10771@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T08:39:40-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>More Commentary on Crawford</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010770.html</link>
<description>Vik Amar has written this Findlaw piece. Key quote: &quot;It doesn&apos;t take a genius to see that relegating plaintiffs to &apos;as applied&apos; challenges in these kinds of cases doesn&apos;t really leave them with much.&quot; Tokaji on Elmendorf on Crawford on...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10770@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T08:36:13-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Steve Hoersting on Leake and SpeechNow.org</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010769.html</link>
<description>See here....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10769@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T08:31:15-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>At Least a Bit of Confusion over Indiana&apos;s &quot;Open&quot; Primary</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010768.html</link>
<description>Ed Still has the details....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10768@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T08:28:56-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Clinton-Obama cash gap looms large&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/010767.html</link>
<description>Jeanne Cummings has written this article for The Politico....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10767@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2008-05-08T08:23:05-08:00</dc:date>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>