<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Election Law</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/</link>
<description>The law of politics and the politics of law: election law, campaign finance, legislation, voting rights, initiatives, redistricting, and the Supreme Court nomination process
Rick Hasen&apos;s web log</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Rick.Hasen@lls.edu</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-02T10:52:58-08:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.2" />
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>

<item>
<title>Independence Day Blogging Break</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014039.html</link>
<description>It has been a very busy period for the blog---November&apos;s election did not end until this week&apos;s Coleman-Franken decision. The Supreme Court&apos;s important ruling in Caperton, the judicial elections case, was followed by the Supreme Court&apos;s surprise ruling in NAMUDNO...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14039@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-02T10:52:58-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Balls, strikes and absentee ballots&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014038.html</link>
<description>Brian Rice offers this commentary on Coleman-Franken at MPR....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14038@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-02T10:39:37-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Commentary: Supreme Court&apos;s Unexpected  &apos;Judicial Minimalism&apos;  in Voting Rights Case&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014037.html</link>
<description>Paul Smith and Joshua Block have written this piece for law.com....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14037@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-02T10:27:39-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Federal Grants Give States Edge in Collecting Precinct-Level Election Data&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014036.html</link>
<description>The EAC has issued this press release....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14036@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-02T10:15:33-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;New Look at Election Spending Looms in September&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014035.html</link>
<description>The WSJ offers this report....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14035@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-02T10:11:08-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Washington Post Sells Access, 25,000+&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014034.html</link>
<description>Very interesting. UPDATE: Well that was quick....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14034@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-02T10:08:17-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;November 2006 Undervote Analysis&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014032.html</link>
<description>Mark Shelden reports....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14032@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T15:40:44-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Persily: Exhausted by Exhaustion</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014031.html</link>
<description>Nate Persily sends along this guest post: Rick Pildes takes me to task for suggesting the Court might perpetually avoid the constitutional shortcomings of the coverage formula for the VRA. He mistakes my speculation and kremlinology of the Court for...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14031@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject>vra renewal guest blogging</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T14:46:13-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;The Rhetoric of a &apos;Stolen&apos; Election&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014030.html</link>
<description>Ned Foley offers this well-deserved criticism of this morning&apos;s WSJ editorial on Coleman-Franken....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14030@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T14:41:17-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;McCain and Feingold Use &apos;Hold&apos; to Pressure Obama on FEC Picks&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014029.html</link>
<description>CQ Politics offers this report....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14029@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T14:34:51-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pildes: Confusion About the Future of Voting-Rights Litigation</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014028.html</link>
<description>Rick Pildes sends along this guest post on NAMUDNO: In the wake of the Supreme Court&apos;s decision to avoid resolving the constitutionality of Section 5 for now, some confusion has emerged about legal questions concerning the next challenge. In particular,...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14028@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject>vra renewal guest blogging</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T11:51:05-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;EAC Releases Report on Voter Registration&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014027.html</link>
<description>Details here....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14027@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T10:20:41-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Using Technology to Push &quot;Weekend Voting Act&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014026.html</link>
<description>See here....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14026@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T10:18:34-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Bit More on Citizens United and the &quot;Incurable Defect&quot;</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014025.html</link>
<description>Following up on this post, a few readers have written to say that the Court would still have jurisdiction over the issue, pointing me to Stern and Gressman pointing out that the Court&apos;s rules are not jurisdictional, but prudential, and...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14025@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T09:47:27-08:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>More Legal Analysis of Yesterday&apos;s MN Supreme Court Ruling in Coleman-Franken</title>
<link>http://electionlawblog.org/archives/014024.html</link>
<description>Star Tribune Pioneer Press...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14024@http://electionlawblog.org/</guid>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T09:14:48-08:00</dc:date>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>