July 24, 2007In Important Case that Could End up at the Supreme Court, 11th Circuit, on 2-1 Vote, Orders Trial on Section 2 Vote Dilution Claim from Glades County, FloridaVia How Appealing comes news of this decision in Thomson v. Glades County Board of County Commissioners. I don't have time to delve into this now, but it raises fascinating issues regarding the meaning of majority-minority and influence districts post Georgia v. Ashcroft and Perry (the court does not acknowledge in its opinion that Congress repudiated the Supreme Court's opinion in Ga. v. Ashcroft (at least in the section 5 context) last summer in renewing the VRA), whether and how minority voter turnout should figure in determining if the Gingles' factors are met, and the appropriate standard of review by an appellate court of a district court decision to grant summary judgment in a section 2 case. The majority also gave this fact (of uncertain legal relevance but certainly fascinating):
age population of 90% or greater, 52% voted in favor of single-member districts; in precincts with a white voting age population of 90% or greater, 48% voted in favor of single-member districts. With regard to the School Board, the final tally indicated 848 votes (54.9%) opposed to single-member districts, and 698 votes (45.1%) in favor of changing the election scheme. Similarly, in precincts with an African American voting age population of 90% or greater, 52% voted in favor of single-member districts; in precincts with a white voting age population of 90% or greater, 47% voted in favor of single-member districts. I am not sure what the prospects are for rehearing this case en banc, but I would not be surprised to see this case end up in the Supreme Court., especially given Judge Tjoflat's dissent. Posted by Rick Hasen at July 24, 2007 04:55 PM |