“On Voting, North Carolina Case Is Test for Justices”

Jost on Justice: For Roberts, the case tests his prevailing view in the decision in Shelby County v. Holder to eliminate the Voting Rights Act’s preclearance decision on the ground that things have changed in the South since the law was enacted in 1965. The recent spate of voter ID laws and other vote suppression laws provides an ironic confirmation of sorts: disenfranchising minority voters is now practiced not just in the South but in other…

Continue reading
Share

Trump Again Threatens Voter Intimidation Methods

…hat the Trump campaign does not organize any efforts at voter intimidation. And even if this is just puffing, there’s the real danger that Trump supporters go rogue. Election protection efforts will be more important than they have been in decades, especially with the loss of federal observers after the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County….

Continue reading
Share

“Opinion: Three ways Congress can muscle-up to your voting rights”

…igged districts, it is time to take action. Clinton supports such action. Not a word from her opponent. Second, BTP would restore essential provisions of the Voting Rights Act, which was eviscerated by the Supreme Court 2013 Shelby v. Holder ruling; promote automatic voter registration for all Americans when they turn 18; and expand early, in-person voting in every state. Clinton supports these actions. Not a word from her opponent. Third, and…

Continue reading
Share

“Voting Rights Success? Not So Fast”

…o look for ever new and creative ways to disenfranchise minorities. Voting rights groups will have to fight each change individually, without the benefits of a preclearance system that the Supreme Court wrongly eliminated in Shelby. This drive to limit the franchise and the findings of the Fourth Circuit in the North Carolina case show the fallacy of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.’s contention in Shelby that intentional racial discrimination…

Continue reading
Share

“Is North Carolina Trying To Lose One Of The Biggest Voting Rights Cases In The Nation?”

…Ian Millhiser for Think Progress. Millhiser: “The whole brief is written to piss off liberals. Opening with Crawford & Shelby County? Why not Lochner & Korematsu!” Farias: This from North Carolina to # SCOTUS strikes me as rather … odd: Leah Litman: “Great news! I found RBG SGB EK & SS edits to NC’s request to stay CA4 voting rights ruling”…

Continue reading
Share

“In Several States, Trump’s Poll Monitors May Be ‘Second Amendment People’”

…rearms from polling places.” The effort failed, and the attorney general reiterated that polling places are not included in the list of banned firearm locations in Alabama. Several counties still insisted on a ban, including Shelby County, whose sheriff said that he would ban open-carry at polling places in his county unless he was otherwise directed. Fears may be compounded this year given Trump’s presence on the ballot. Throughout his…

Continue reading
Share

“Redistricting, Voter ID Laws, Early Voting, And The Post-Shelby World”

…w bookAmerica Votes (affiliate link), which Griffith also edited. In a wide-ranging discussion about voting rights restrictions, they share the less well-known backdoor to the Voting Rights Act that could alleviate the sting Shelby County laid on activists in the old pre-clearance jurisdictions. On the other side of the fence: Representative Paul Stam, Speaker Pro Tempore of the North Carolina House of Representatives, and a defender of the both…

Continue reading
Share

New Edition of The Law of Democracy Available

…approach; a new Chapter 6 now presents the constitutional vote dilution issues first in the race context and then in the partisan gerrymandering context. Chapter 7 is devoted exclusively to the Voting Rights Act. We have shortened the legislative history of Section 2, and tightened our coverage of Section 2 vote-dilution claims, while adding coverage of Section 2 vote-denial claims. In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County v….

Continue reading
Share

“Turning the Tide on Voting Rights”

…ision to the full Fourth Circuit, the state probably would have won. But retirements and new judges have turned the Fourth Circuit into a much more liberal court. Second, Republican legislatures overplayed their hand. After the Supreme Court gave the green light in 2008 to Indiana’s strict voter identification law in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board and effectively gutted preclearance in Shelby County v. Holder in 2013, Republican…

Continue reading
Share

“Will the Court Revisit Shelby County?”

…th a history of racial discrimination in voting to get their election changes pre-approved by the federal government. With Section 5 no longer in effect, most experts think it would be difficult to fashion a case challenging Shelby, and that even if you could, restoring Section 5 by judicial fiat might be too aggressive for some of the court’s liberals. More likely, for now, is that the court takes a different approach. Since Shelby, another…

Continue reading
Share

“Lawyers’ Committee Expresses Disappointment with U.S. Department of Justice Decision to Terminate Critical Federal Observer Program”

…federal judges have found that it violates the Voting Rights Act – three of them before Shelby County and four of them after.  The case is currently before the full Fifth Circuit, with a decision due any day.  But because of Shelby County, Texas’s law remains in force while we wait for a final decision – and it is not the only one.  Because of Shelby County, other states have also enacted laws that restrict voting rights.  And these laws have…

Continue reading
Share

2016 Election Law Supplement Shipping Aug. 2; Instructors Can Get Electronic Copy Now

…d Materials is up to date through the end of the Supreme Court’s October 2015 term. It includes excerpts of the Supreme Court’s decisions in McCutcheon v. FEC and other post-Citizens United campaign finance cases, as well as Shelby County v. Holder, which struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act. This year’s supplement covers recent redistricting cases from Alabama, Arizona, Texas, and Virginia, including Evenwel v. Abbott, the…

Continue reading
Share

“Lawyers’ Committee Releases New Report Examining Voting Rights Restrictions Following 2013 Supreme Court Ruling”

…Release: Today, the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (Lawyers’ Committee) released a new report, “Voting Rights Communication Pipelines: Georgia After Shelby County v. Holder” – examining Georgia, one of fourteen states that was subject to protections provided by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, before the 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision that gutted this key provision in Shelby County v. Holder….

Continue reading
Share

Verrilli’s Regret

…From must-read Adam Liptak exit interview with the outgoing SG: The loss he most regrets, Mr. Verrilli said, was in 2013, in Shelby County v. Holder, which effectively struck down the heart of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. “There are some powerful real-world consequences that followed very quickly from that decision,” he said. “It was an iconic statute and an important part of American history. That was a tough loss.”…

Continue reading
Share

“Democracy Diminished: LDF Releases Report on State and Local Threats to Voting Rights Three Years After Landmark Shelby County Decision”

…to Voting Post- Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder (Shelby County), a detailed collection of state, county, and local voting changes — proposed or implemented — during the past three years since the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder. The Court’s decision in Shelby County eliminated the provision of the Act that for fifty years required jurisdictions with a history of voting discrimination to submit proposed changes to a…

Continue reading
Share

“Voter Welfare: An Emerging Rule of Reason in Voting Rights Law”

…ry intent or statutory protections of minority voting opportunity. Although only some of these challenges arise in jurisdictions that were formerly covered by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Shelby County further compels a new legal approach to these cases. This article begins with the observation that, at least thus far, courts have been remarkably sympathetic to these new claims of voter exclusion, even…

Continue reading
Share

“Inventing Equal Sovereignty”

…013 decision in Shelby County v. Holder relied on the “fundamental principle” and “historic tradition” of equal sovereignty to hold one of the Voting Rights Act’s key provisions unconstitutional. Yet almost three years after Shelby County, and despite a recent wave of equal sovereignty challenges to major federal programs, the equal sovereignty principle remains largely unexamined. This Article seeks to provide some clarity—both to establish the…

Continue reading
Share

Major New Edition of “The Law of Democracy,” (Issacharoff, Karlan, Pildes, Persily) Available for Fall

…Act. We have shortened the legislative history of Section 2, and tightened our coverage of Section 2 vote-dilution claims, while adding coverage of Section 2 vote-denial claims. In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County v. Holder, we have streamlined significantly our coverage of the preclearance regime of Section 5, while preserving the core issues that continue to have current implications. We’ve managed to revise the…

Continue reading
Share

2016 Supplement for Lowenstein, Hasen, and Tokaji Election Law Casebook Coming in time for Fall Classes

…d Materials is up to date through the end of the Supreme Court’s October 2015 term. It includes excerpts of the Supreme Court’s decisions in McCutcheon v. FEC and other post-Citizens United campaign finance cases, as well as Shelby County v. Holder, which struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act. This year’s supplement covers recent redistricting cases from Alabama, Arizona, Texas, and Virginia, including Evenwel v. Abbott, the…

Continue reading
Share

“U.S. judge upholds Virginia voter ID law”

…the Fifteenth Amendment, or the Twenty-Sixth Amendment,” U.S. District Judge Henry E. Hudson wrote Thursday. You can read the 62 page opinion here. Virginia’s law is not as strict as some other laws being challenged, and in all of these challenges, the standards for winning are quite difficult for plaintiffs. This is why the loss of Section 5 preclearance thanks to the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. Holder…

Continue reading
Share

“Uncovering the Voting Rights Act: The Racial Progress Argument in Shelby County”

…d exceptional legislation back then is no longer prevalent or flagrant. This perspective can be summed up with the motif, “that was then, this is now.” In this Article I reconstruct the majority’s racial progress argument in Shelby County, and raise some concerns about ways of answering it that merely replace a conservative narrative about racial progress with a liberal one. Although I am partial to the latter narrative, and believe that the…

Continue reading
Share

4th Circuit Panel Which Partially Reversed NC Voting Decision in 2014 Likely to Get Case Back on Appeal

…rship likely knew it could not have gotten past federal preclearance in the pre–Shelby County era. McCrory, 997 F. Supp. 2d at 336. Thus, to whatever extent the Supreme Court could rightly celebrate voting rights progress in Shelby County, the post-Shelby County facts on the ground in North Carolina should have cautioned the district court against doing so here. 5. Looking at local factors and history, and and undisputed evidence that the…

Continue reading
Share

Breaking: #SCOTUS Unanimously Rejects AZ Redistricting Challenge: Analysis

…ourt directly holds that in this case, as it is not necessary to the decision.) And it held that Arizona could have deviated from perfect equality to comply with Section 5 of the Act, which the Court later gutted in the 2013 Shelby County case. It rejected the idea that because of the later Shelby case, reliance on Section 5 becomes suspect. Finally, the Court rejected the idea that this was a partisan gerrymander, obliquely recognizing the race…

Continue reading
Share

“Texas photo ID law stands despite challenges since Supreme Court ruling weakened Voting Rights Act”

…he LAT: Seemingly untouched by numerous legal defeats, the voter ID law serves as an example of how difficult it can be to halt potentially discriminatory voting rules in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County vs. Holder. “This is a perfect illustration of what we lost,” said Jon Greenbaum, chief counsel for the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. “We have seven judges who looked at this and all found a…

Continue reading
Share

“Voting Rights Institute Asks Department of Justice to Investigate Daphne, Ala. for Possible Voting Rights Violations”

…ng locations for most of the city’s heavily white districts. “This is exactly the type of voting change that would have had to have been precleared by the Department of Justice before the Supreme Court’s disastrous ruling in Shelby County v. Holder,” said Harry Baumgarten, Legal Fellow with the Voting Rights Institute . “In gutting a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, the Supreme Court has opened the door for these potentially…

Continue reading
Share

“What if the Supreme Court Were Liberal?”

…would likely overrule Citizens United and say that it is returning to its earlier approach. Congressional power. Conservatives on the Court long have wanted to limit the scope of congressional power. For example, in 2013, in Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder, the Court struck down key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. This was the first time since the 19th century that the Court invalidated a federal civil-rights law dealing with race….

Continue reading
Share

“Douglas and Mazo’s Election Law Stories”

…ories book. This title offers a rich and detailed account of the most significant cases in election law, including the landmark decisions of Reynolds v. Sims, Bush v. Gore, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and Shelby County v. Holder. The book relies on a unique encapsulated approach to storytelling, as each of its authors surveys an important doctrinal area in the field through the telling of his or her story. The volume’s…

Continue reading
Share

My Thoughts on AZ Long Lines: Incompetence, Not Vote Suppression, and Blame #SCOTUS First

…ened if #SCOTUS Hadn’t Killed Voting Rights Act Provision?  My point was that Maricopa County’s decision to cut the number of polling places by 2/3 would not have been possible before the Supreme Court decided the 2013 Shelby County v. Holder case because to do so Arizona, which had been covered by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, would have had to demonstrate (and likely would not have been able to demonstrate) that doing so would not…

Continue reading
Share

“The Right to ‘Mobocracy’”

…cial ire for the Supreme Court, which in recent years has opposed his views in cases like Citizens United, which ruled that a 1907 congressional ban on corporate contributions to political campaigns was unconstitutional, and Shelby County v. Holder, which overturned Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965—Mr. Waldman uses the word “eviscerated.” Yet Mr. Waldman’s proposed reforms deserve serious consideration. Reforming felon…

Continue reading
Share

Judge Merrick Garland: A Moderate Liberal on Election Law Issues, With Questions About Boldness

…g as it had offered before to get preclearance.  The court approved other changes to Florida election law, finding they would not make minority voters worse off. The Supreme Court eliminated preclearance the next year in the Shelby County case, and so this precise holding would no longer have direct relevance. Nonetheless, the tone of this opinion is one who takes seriously to protect voting rights. Judge Garland seems much less likely to go out…

Continue reading
Share

ELB Podcast Episode 10. Janai Nelson: Minority Voting Rights in 2016

What has happened to African-American voting rights after the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. Holder? Can the Voting Rights Act still protect minority voting rights in states such as Alabama and Texas? What are the prospects that a new Congress will step in to protect everyone’s right to vote? On Episode 10 of the ELB Podcast, we talk to the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund’s Janai Nelson. You can…

Continue reading
Share

“Alabama’s New Fight for Voting Rights”

…s week with worries of a resurgent era of voter suppression—concerns that have taken on new urgency ahead of the first presidential election since the landmark Shelby decision. And Alabama provides a striking example of post-Shelby uncertainty among civil rights activists. In the nearly three years since the Shelby decision, the state’s implementation of the voter ID law has been something of a saga. In September 2015, for instance,…

Continue reading
Share

“The Voting Rights Act at 50: The Past, Present, and Future of the Right to Vote”

…Intent: Statutory Interpretation and the Constitutionality of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act Joshua S. Sellers PDF Equal Sovereignty as a Right Against a Remedy Seth Davis PDF Reflections on Justice Thurgood Marshall and Shelby County v. Holder Wendy B. Scott PDF The Forgotten Provision of the Fourteenth Amendment: Section 2 and the Evolution of American Democracy Earl M. Maltz PDF The Necessity of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the…

Continue reading
Share

“A New Proposal to Address Local Voting Discrimination”

…are examining the structural apparatus that remains for enforcing federal voting rights. This Article subjects that enforcement apparatus to scrutiny. It finds the remaining means to challenge voting impediments in the post-Shelby County world — (1) individual lawsuits by private citizens, (2) impact-litigation by law firms and non-profits, and (3) bureaucratic enforcement by the U.S. Department of Justice — are woefully inadequate. There are…

Continue reading
Share

Breaking: SCOTUS, Without Noted Dissent, Denies Stay in NC Redistricting Case. What Does It Mean?

…state and orders its own maps. That would take some time, but with the primary now potentially put off until June there is time. Now of course virtually none of this would have happened if the Supreme Court had not ruled in Shelby County to strike down the trigger for the preclearance provisions of the VRA. North Carolina would have had to submit any new maps to DOJ, which then could have withheld preclearance if they made protected minority…

Continue reading
Share

Revised Version of Paper on Election Law at the Roberts Court

…down a strong conservative path. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission freed corporate money in U.S. candidate elections and opened up a deregulatory era increasingly dominated by nominally independent “Super PACs.” Shelby County v. Holder eviscerated the congressional regime codified in Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under which Congress required states and localities with a history of racial discrimination in voting to obtain…

Continue reading
Share

EAC’s Brian Newby Sued for Citizenship Form Decision

…Georgia Coalition for the Peoples’ Agenda. “We believe the requirement to provide proof of citizenship to register to vote is an unnecessary barrier, especially for communities of color.” “This is a part of our ongoing post-Shelby election administration monitoring across Georgia,” said Francys Johnson, Statesboro civil rights attorney and Georgia NAACP state president. “This case is illustrious of the insidious tricks, subterfuge, and attacks…

Continue reading
Share

“Virginia Asks Court To Ignore Pre-1965 Discrimination In Voting Rights Case”

…n the grounds that such history is not probative in a challenge to a more recent legislative action,” the motion said. However, according to UC-Irvine School of Law professor Rick Hasen, who runs Election Law blog, the Shelby County did not rule out the consideration of a state’s discriminatory history outright. “Shelby County tells us obviously you can’t make decisions just based on the past, but it doesn’t make it…

Continue reading
Share

“Arguments Over North Carolina Voter ID Law Begin in Federal Court”

…ght examine balloting laws in the wake of the United States Supreme Court decision that, in 2013, upended a significant component of the Voting Rights Act. “The North Carolina litigation is the leading litigation in the post-Shelby world,” said Edward B. Foley, an elections law expert at Ohio State University, referring to the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County, Alabama, v. Holder. “It’s the test case, the battleground case more than any…

Continue reading
Share

Shelby County, Texas Lose Voting Fee Cases Before the Supreme Court

…Today’s Supreme Court order list includes news that Shelby County, Alabama was denied fees in its voting case which got a key part of the Voting Rights Act struck down as unconstitutional. On this case, see my earlier post, Chutzpah Dep’t: Court Rejects Shelby County Plaintiffs’ Request for $2 Million in Attorney’s Fees. Texas also will have to pay lots of plaintiffs’ attorneys fees in a preclearance redistricting case….

Continue reading
Share

Ed Blum Statement to ELB on Guardian Article: No Regrets about Shelby County

…he Guardian in which the architect of the lawsuits to bring down Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act appeared to express some second thoughts about how things have worked out since the Surpeme Court decimated Section 5 in the Shelby County case. In response, Ed sends along the following statement: Just because I have concerns about some jurisdictions imposing voting requirements that discourage participation, it does not follow that I have…

Continue reading
Share

Ed Blum’s Regret

…hought of this before he put together the team to decimate the Voting Rights Act. Andrew Gumbel in The Guardian: Some of Blum’s cases have had such an impact that even he has been taken aback. Nowhere is that truer than with Shelby County v Holder, a case he sponsored that in 2013 led the supreme court to overturn a key provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Blum told the Guardian he has worried over the fallout from that ruling, which spurred…

Continue reading
Share