“How to end American plutocracy: Risk of corruption cannot be the only legal rationale for limiting expenditures”

I have written this oped for the NY Daily News (tied to today’s release of my book).  It begins:

Forty years ago this month, the Supreme Court decided Buckley vs. Valeo, a case that has distorted our thinking and talking about money in politics for nearly two generations and that has taken this country down a perilous path on campaign finance.

We should no longer mince words about the consequences for our representative government. Buckley and its offspring Citizens United, which turns six this month, are leading us to plutocracy, a country in which those with greatest wealth have a much better chance to influence elections and public policy than the rest of us.

Yet despite that bleak assessment, there’s some cause for hope. Although SuperPACs and mega-donors shelling out donations topping a whopping $100 million have emerged from the Supreme Court’s troubling decisions, a narrow opportunity for change is coming — provided we can change the way we think about the danger of big money in politics.


Comments are closed.