Emory “Judging Politics” Symposium

61 EMORY LAW JOURNAL, NO. 4, PP. 641-944, 2012.

The 2011 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium. Judging Politics: Judges as Political Actors, Candidates, and Arbiters of the Political. 61 Emory L.J. 641-861 (2012). [H][L][W]

Fried, Charles. Balls and strikes. 61 Emory L.J. 641-662 (2012). [H][L][W]

NeJaime, Douglas. The legal mobilization dilemma. 61 Emory L.J. 663-736 (2012). [H][L][W]

Epstein, Lee and Andrew D. Martin. Is the Roberts Court especially activist? A study of invalidating (and upholding) federal, state, and local laws. 61 Emory L.J. 737-758 (2012). [H][L][W]

Tamanaha, Brian Z. The several meanings of “politics” in judicial politics studies: why “ideological influence” is not “partisanship.” 61 Emory L.J. 759-778 (2012). [H][L][W]

Hasen, Richard L. Anticipatory overrulings, invitations, time bombs, and inadvertence: how Supreme Court justices move the law. 61 Emory L.J. 779-799 (2012). [H][L][W]

Charles, Guy-Uriel, Daniel L. Chen and Mitu Gulati. Sonia Sotomayor and the construction of merit. 61 Emory L.J. 801-861 (2012). [H][L][W]

Saidman, Benjamin A. Comment. Designing around a patent injunction: developing a comprehensive framework for determining when contempt proceedings are appropriate. 61 Emory L.J. 863-902 (2012). [H][L][W]

Sharpes, Dustin. Comment. Reintroducing intent into predatory pricing law. 61 Emory L.J. 903-943 (2012). [H][L][W]

Share this: