Category Archives: primaries

“Wisconsin: Key thoughts on the primaries”

The Recall Elections Blog roundup.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries, recall elections | Comments Off

“How S.C. 2012 primaries imploded (+ survey); Court ruling on filing law dumped 1-in-5 candidates from ballot”

The State reports [corrected link].

Share
Posted in ballot access, primaries | Comments Off

Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?

Politico on Americans Elect: Third-party candidate for POTUS: Anyone? Walker?

Share
Posted in ballot access, primaries, third parties | Comments Off

CA Court Rejects Challenge to “Top Two” Primary

See this ruling on the motion for a demurrer and this denial of a preliminary injunction.

No surprises here.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“The 2012 GOP Nomination Contest Affirms Value of New Rules”

Sheahan Virgin and Rob Richie write.

Share
Posted in alternative voting systems, political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“R.N.C. Rejects Changes to Nominating Contests for 2016″

NYT’s “The Caucus” blog: “Members of the Republican National Committee considered — and rejected — changes to their presidential nominating process for 2016 after a contest this year that some members say was too long and drawn out. At a meeting here of the R.N.C.’s rules committee, members debated whether to abandon the proportional voting that gave Mitt Romney’s rivals the ability to try and accumulate delegates even as they failed to win the nominating contests.”

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Iowa Republicans to Review Caucus System”

Political Wire reports.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

Santorum “Hail Mary” Pass to Get Texas to Change Primary Allocation to Winner-Take-All

The Texas Tribune explains.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Mitt Romney is not as weak as you think”

MacLeans on the new primary rules.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Republican primary turnout rebounds, is up overall”

The Fix reports.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Santorum Campaign Floats New Delegate Math Showing Much Tighter Race With Romney”

ABC News reports.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Illinois ballot deal saved Romney”

Politico: Mitt Romney’s vaunted organization nearly failed him in Illinois, where he only remained eligible for delegates on the ballot after a negotiated truce between his campaign and Rick Santorum’s people.”

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

More Chaos at the Caucuses

The Brad Blog reports.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Chaos At Missouri GOP Caucuses”

TPM reports.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“All Odds Aside, G.O.P. Girding for Floor Fight”

Interesting NYT report.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Santorum Faces Ballot Problems in Pennsylvania”

Political Wire reports.

Share
Posted in ballot access, political parties, primaries | Comments Off

Read the Reply Brief in Case Challenging Top Two in 9th Circuit

Here it is.

Share
Posted in ballot access, political parties, primaries, third parties | Comments Off

“2012: Year Of The Caucus Meltdown”

TPM reports.

Share
Posted in election administration, political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Romney Delegate Total Nearly Matches Total if All Contests Winner-Take-All”

FairVote: “Contrary to conventional wisdom, current projected delegate totals for frontrunner Mitt Romney are far closer to what they would have been if every state had used a winner-take-all rule for allocating delegates than if they had used proportional allocation of delegates. Romney’s share of delegates currently is projected at 52.1%. If every state and territory had allocated delegates by winner-take-all, his share of delegates would be just 53.0%.”

Share
Posted in alternative voting systems, political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“California could decide the GOP nominee”

Interesting report from The Fix.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

Romney Not Reaching 1,144 Delegates Any Time Soon

NYT: “While Mr. Romney holds considerable advantages over his rivals, his aides acknowledge that he is unlikely to reach the 1,144 delegates needed to secure the nomination for at least two more months. His challengers have gradually given up on the idea of surpassing him and have turned to a strategy of trying to block him from reaching the delegates he needs to effectively end the nominating contest.”

Prediction: Regardless of who ends up the ultimate nominee, expect Republicans to reconsider the Michael-Steele “excitement” strategy for delegate selection for the 2016 or 2020 contest.  More winner-take-all; less proportionality.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Michael Steele: “I Wanted a Brokered Convention”

Mother Jones:

“I wanted a brokered convention,” Steele tells me. “That was one of my goals.” Why in the world would a party chairman desire apparent turmoil? To create excitement and shake up the party, Steele explains. So far this year, he has indeed succeeded in one regard: The Republican race remains unsettled. And that’s unsettling many within the party’s upper ranks.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“As Rivals Divide, Romney Gains”

WSJ: “The divided support between Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich has prevented either from becoming a permanent heir to the Not-Mitt mantle. As long as both are in the race, neither can likely amass enough delegates to overtake Mr. Romney.”

Share
Posted in alternative voting systems, primaries | Comments Off

U.S. News Debate Club on a National Primary

Interesting perspectives, and makes me long for the days of Legal Affairs Debate Club.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

Convention Fight for Republicans?

Mark Siegel, former executive director of DNC, games it out.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Innovative Analysis: Six Takes on the Republican Nomination Contest”

A FairVote compendium.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Panel Says Long, Tough Campaign Will Help, Not Hurt Mitt Romney”

U.S. News reports.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Can Caucuses Be Defended?”

Scott LeMieux weighs in on the Hasen/Bernstein debate.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Angus King entrance shakes up Maine Senate race”

Politico: “The independent Senate candidacy of former Maine Gov. Angus King is having a chilling effect on the potential bid of Democratic Rep. Chellie Pingree.”

If King runs, there will be no runoff: it will be a three-person race with a plurality winner.

And King could be King: if the Senate is almost evenly divided, would he caucus with Republicans, or Democrats?

Share
Posted in campaigns, political parties, primaries | Comments Off

Will Some Republicans and Democrats Run Listing “No Party Preference” Under the New Top Two?

Allan Hoffenblum reports. Thanks to a loyal reader for passing along the link.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Yes, Caucuses Are Unfair. No, We Shouldn’t Mind.”

Jonathan Bernstein has a thoughtful response up at the New Republic to my Slate piece, Kill the Caucuses.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

Will Four-Way Republican Race Continue through June?

NYT’s “The Caucus” games it out. I suspect that if Romney ekes out a victory in Ohio, there will be lots of pressure on Santorum to drop out, and a coalescing further around Romney.

Share
Posted in campaigns, primaries | Comments Off

“Obama’s delegate operation was a textbook case in presidential politics”

Dan Balz has written this column.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“More Caucus Problems Reported”

This time in Washington State.

Kill the caucuses.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

Looking Like a Post-Super Tuesday Delegate Fight Coming to Ohio, and It is Santorum’s Fault

Michael Falcone has the scoop.  Truly a self-inflicted wound.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Santorum camp accuses Michigan GOP of ‘political thuggery’ in awarding delegates to Romney”

Getting ugly.  And another black eye on how the Republican Party in the states (mostly caucus states) have been running their delegate selection processes.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“The Presidential Primary System: How Well Does it Serve American Democracy?”

The Bipartisan Policy Center will hold this event with Jay Cost, John Fortier, Curtis Gans, and David Norcross on March 8.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

Richie: Michigan Primary: Winning Isn’t Everything (and Not the Only Thing)

Here’s a guest post from Rob Richie of Fairvote, making an important observation:

The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza wrote last night that “In politics, winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing. The score sheet only shows ‘W’s’ and ‘L’s’….When we look back in the history books, all it will say is that Romney won Michigan and Arizona.”

To be sure, Mitt Romney’s wins yesterday boosted his campaign, but Cillizza overstates their significance. In a nomination contest that may easily end up being all about convention delegates, the results were more divided. Rick Santorum has likely won half of Michigan’s voting delegates, and Romney’s Arizona delegate sweep faces a challenge at the convention due to the Arizona GOP’s flagrant violation of RNC rules.

In Michigan, Romney won the state vote by just under 3%. But winning doesn’t necessarily forecast future outcomes – consider the post-Iowa momentum shifts of Romney winning New Hampshire, Gingrich South Carolina, Romney Florida, Santorum’s three state sweep of February 7th and now Romney’s return. More to the point, Michigan’s voting delegates were allocated primarily by congressional district, not the statewide result. Although the Secretary of State bizarrely reports primary results according to Michigan’s old congressional district map, Michigan’s GOP instead uses results in the state’s 14 new districts. Santorum and Romney each have relatively secure leads in seven districts.

Because Michigan violated party rules by voting in February, the RNC stripped half of its convention delegates. Each district winner earns two voting delegates in Tampa. Although additional delegates will be awarded to Romney and Santorum based on their proportion of the statewide vote, only two statewide delegates will vote in Tampa. Romney forces maintain they’ll get both delegates, but Santorum backers argue for one each. Michigan ultimately seems likely to have 15 voting delegates each for Romney and Santorum – and Santorum would have won an 17-13 edge if he had won all the votes cast for withdrawn candidates like Bachmann, Cain and Perry and overcome Romney’s 0.8% edge.

Meanwhile, Arizona has joined Florida in violating the crystal clear RNC prohibition against winner-take-all allocation of delegates in contests held before April 1st. The RNC has left penalizing states for this infraction to the convention’s credentials committee, and if the race stays close or the delegate leader is seen as a weak nominee, expect fireworks — and potentially many delegates voting their conscience, as I’ve argued in POLITICO is permitted.

I see two key lessons here. First, pundits should calm down about order of finish in particular states. Let this contest unfold, give more voters a chance to participate and have the eventual nominee prove his mettle under fire, as clearly helped Democrats in 2008 despite similar grumbling early on. Second, congressional district outcomes don’t necessarily reflect popular vote outcomes –something the nation may discuss much more if Pennsylvania Republicans revive their proposal to allocate electors based on congressional district. Certainly, allocating delegates by district is not “proportional representation” – a term wrongly applied to a wide array of state rules this year.

Onto Super Tuesday and, quite possibly, state wins by all four remaining candidates.

–Rob Richie

Share
Posted in alternative voting systems, political parties, primaries | Comments Off

Given Maine’s Ballot Access Rules, Running for Sen. Snowe’s Seat Will Be No Easy Task

Bangor Daily News:

The deadline to get on the primary ballot for Republican and Democratic candidates is March 15.  Any interested candidate will need to get 2,000 certified signatures by that date (which means well above 2,000 total if you figure in the names that will be thrown out), or they won’t be on the ballot.

The logistical requirements of actually meeting that hurdle are very high.  This is not something that can be done by a political novice in two weeks – indeed it is a difficult task for established figures.

In the 2010 gubernatorial contest, both Democrats and Republicans were having a difficult time getting enough signatures, and most campaigns only managed to finish collecting them a few days before they were due.  That was with a year (sometimes more) lead time.  People now have two weeks.

Unless something changes – I have heard mention that the Maine legislature has the capability to push that date back, but my sources say there have been no conversations about that yet – that means that the only people that can pull it off are folks with already established political machines, or people with the money to instantly purchase the manpower to get it done.

This has implications for more than just the Senate race.  If Chellie Pingree or Mike Michaud (or both) decide to run for the Senate seat, that means that potential candidates to replace them in the House of Representatives would have to meet that requirement as well

Share
Posted in ballot access, primaries | Comments Off

“Romney, Santorum to split Michigan’s delegates”

Detroit Free Press: “The Michigan presidential primary vote was close and so will be the distribution of delegates based on the results in Michigan’s 14 congressional districts.”

More on this coming.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Despite problems elsewhere, Minnesota Republicans remain happy with caucuses”

MinnPost reports.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“So why do we have a process that excludes soldiers and transfers power to party insiders when we could have one that includes everyone and forces the party insiders to be accountable?”

Soren Dayton on why it is time to kill the caucus.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“How Serious Is The Democratic Crossover Vote Threat In Michigan?”

TPM explores.

Share
Posted in chicanery, political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Conventional Wisdom: Republicans are growing worried that they are headed to a ‘brokered convention’ in Tampa. It’s unlikely—but there is still plenty to worry about.”

John Dickerson writes at Slate.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“The Secretary of State wholeheartedly supports Iowa’s current caucus process and intends to do everything he can to preserve it”

Don’t expect the Iowa caucus to fade away any time soon, via Electionline Weekly.

Share
Posted in election administration, political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Michigan Democratic Party encourages crossover voting in GOP presidential primary”

The Fix: “Operation Chaos in Michigan? Again? The Michigan Democratic Party sent an e-mail to supporters Wednesday encouraging them to take part in the state’s Republican presidential primary on Tuesday.”

Share
Posted in chicanery, political parties, primaries | Comments Off

Ralston on Nevada Caucus: It Makes Keystone Cops look like the Mossad

Jon Ralson (the person to read on Nevada politics) on what really happened in the GOP caucus: “Whatever you have heard, whatever you have read about the GOP caucus disaster, it was worse. I come to that conclusion after talking to some folks who were eyewitnesses to this embarrassing bit of history. Despite Republican National Committeeman Bob List’s game efforts to put a good face to the world — we released certified results sooner than Iowa! — this was a comedy without a laugh track, one that makes the Keystone Cops look like the Mossad.”

Maybe we should….Kill the Caucuses!

 

Share
Posted in election administration, political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“In Maine, a County Votes, Ron Paul Wins, but Not by Enough to Overtake Romney”

The latest.

Share
Posted in political parties, primaries | Comments Off

“Where things stand on the remaining interim maps (the quick version)”

Texas Redistricting gives the quick version.

Share
Posted in primaries, redistricting, Voting Rights Act | Comments Off

“Maine GOP: [Caucus] Results went to spam”

Politico reports.  Truly the Keystone Kops Kaucuses.

Share
Posted in election administration, political parties, primaries | Comments Off